vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of T Stamp Inc (IDAI) and Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
T Stamp Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($908.9K vs $881.5K, roughly 1.0× Serve Robotics Inc.). T Stamp Inc runs the higher net margin — -279.9% vs -3888.1%, a 3608.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Serve Robotics Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (400.1% vs -39.3%). T Stamp Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.0M vs $-46.1M). Over the past eight quarters, T Stamp Inc's revenue compounded faster (25.9% CAGR vs -3.5%).
T Stamp Inc, trading under ticker IDAI, develops AI-powered identity verification, trust scoring, and fraud prevention solutions. It serves clients across fintech, healthcare, and e-commerce segments, primarily operating in North America to help organizations securely authenticate user identities and mitigate fraud risks.
Ecovacs Robotics is a Chinese technology company. It is best known for developing in-home robotic appliances. The company was founded in 1998 by Qian Dongqi and is headquartered in Suzhou, China. According to Global Asia, Ecovacs Robotics had more than 60% of the Chinese market for robots by 2013. In 2023, Nikkei Asia had reported that the market capitalisation of Ecovacs Robotics has grown to near $6.38 billion, which is "roughly 5 times" that of the market capitalisation of rivalling US bas...
IDAI vs SERV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $908.9K | $881.5K |
| Net Profit | $-2.5M | $-34.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | -757.3% |
| Operating Margin | -224.9% | -4572.1% |
| Net Margin | -279.9% | -3888.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -39.3% | 400.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 57.7% | -161.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.37 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $908.9K | $881.5K | ||
| Q3 25 | $872.5K | $687.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $812.7K | $642.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.5K | $440.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5M | $176.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | $511.1K | $222.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $500.4K | $468.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $573.7K | $946.7K |
| Q4 25 | $-2.5M | $-34.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.9M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | $-20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.2M | $-13.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.0M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.3M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $-9.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | -757.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -637.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -445.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -333.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -371.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -70.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 62.8% |
| Q4 25 | -224.9% | -4572.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -203.0% | -5067.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -207.0% | -3527.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -396.5% | -3406.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -81.2% | -7701.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -523.7% | -3804.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -524.7% | -1828.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -496.7% | -814.6% |
| Q4 25 | -279.9% | -3888.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -219.1% | -4806.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -210.7% | -3247.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -395.5% | -3000.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -401.5% | -7441.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -245.7% | -3601.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -519.3% | -1931.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -466.9% | -954.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.37 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.72 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.69 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.89 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.14 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.06 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.19 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.97 | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.0M | $106.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.7M | $350.7M |
| Total Assets | $11.2M | $367.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $6.0M | $106.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4M | $116.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $292.1K | $116.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $197.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8M | $123.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $598.0K | $50.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $659.5K | $28.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $816.7K | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.7M | $350.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | $283.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4M | $207.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1M | $210.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | $131.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4M | $56.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $750.4K | $28.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $-8.8M |
| Q4 25 | $11.2M | $367.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.2M | $299.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7M | $214.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.6M | $216.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.6M | $139.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.6M | $61.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2M | $32.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | $4.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.0M | $-29.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.0M | $-46.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 215.4% | -5234.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | 1872.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-5.7M | $-117.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | $-29.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.0M | $-25.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.1M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.5M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.7M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.2M | $-4.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | $-46.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.0M | $-36.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.1M | $-22.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.7M | $-11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.2M | $-4.1M |
| Q4 25 | 215.4% | -5234.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -459.6% | -5314.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -258.6% | -3426.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -289.2% | -2934.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -182.9% | -6307.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -475.4% | -4529.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -320.9% | -1396.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -376.6% | -431.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 1872.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 1649.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 940.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | 785.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 2755.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 2070.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | 169.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 0.4% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
