vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. (IDR) and Ivanhoe Electric Inc. (IE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.6M vs $896.0K, roughly 16.3× Ivanhoe Electric Inc.). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 64.3% vs -4500.4%, a 4564.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (92.0% vs -32.7%). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.2M vs $-25.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Ivanhoe Electric Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (57.8% CAGR vs 57.2%).
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.IDREarnings & Financial Report
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is a U.S.-based natural resource company focused on the exploration, development, and production of critical and strategic minerals. Primarily operating in Idaho, it targets rare earth elements, gold, silver, and other high-demand minerals, supplying products to the clean energy, defense, and industrial manufacturing sectors across North America.
Ivanhoe Electric Inc. is a critical minerals exploration and development firm focused on metals for global electrification. It targets high-grade copper, gold, silver and strategic deposits, with primary North American operations, supplying raw materials to renewable energy, EV and power grid infrastructure supply chains worldwide.
IDR vs IE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.6M | $896.0K |
| Net Profit | $9.4M | $-40.3M |
| Gross Margin | 68.5% | 69.5% |
| Operating Margin | 62.4% | -4167.7% |
| Net Margin | 64.3% | -4500.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 92.0% | -32.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 220.6% | -318.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.62 | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $14.6M | $896.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $545.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.5M | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | $735.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.6M | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2M | $671.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.1M | $538.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $360.0K |
| Q4 25 | $9.4M | $-40.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $-17.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $-23.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $-34.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9M | $18.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | $-43.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $-46.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $-60.1M |
| Q4 25 | 68.5% | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.6% | 51.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 57.8% | 72.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.8% | 60.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.3% | 64.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.7% | 61.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.2% | 64.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.1% | 72.2% |
| Q4 25 | 62.4% | -4167.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.4% | -4328.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.6% | -2400.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | -3674.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.2% | -2229.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.4% | -6233.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.2% | -9023.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.3% | -15800.3% |
| Q4 25 | 64.3% | -4500.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.8% | -3214.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.2% | -2233.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.1% | -4645.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.5% | 1386.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | -6443.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.2% | -8695.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.8% | -16693.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.62 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $0.18 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | $0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.12 | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | $0.39 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.17 | $0.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $173.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $108.2M | $416.1M |
| Total Assets | $116.2M | $483.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.02× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $173.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $88.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $98.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $41.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $81.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3M | $133.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3M | $179.4M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $108.2M | $416.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.3M | $280.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.3M | $293.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.8M | $307.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.7M | $268.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.1M | $250.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.4M | $289.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.6M | $331.5M |
| Q4 25 | $116.2M | $483.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.1M | $386.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.7M | $400.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.1M | $414.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.0M | $374.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.8M | $375.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.2M | $416.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.7M | $461.2M |
| Q4 25 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.15× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $10.7M | $-25.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.2M | $-25.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 56.0% | -2872.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 17.7% | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.15× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $12.4M | $-90.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $-25.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4M | $-27.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | $-15.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $-30.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | $-36.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $-44.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | $-50.0M |
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | $-25.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $709.8K | $-27.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | $-21.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | $-15.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $-32.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9M | $-36.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $-45.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | $-50.6M |
| Q4 25 | 56.0% | -2872.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | -5103.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.5% | -1990.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | -2146.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | -2432.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.4% | -5506.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.7% | -8372.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.3% | -14064.2% |
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.8% | 117.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 127.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 93.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.5% | 186.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.50× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.08× | -1.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.22× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.19× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
