vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. (IDR) and KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.8M vs $14.6M, roughly 1.8× Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 64.3% vs -101.7%, a 166.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (92.0% vs -26.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (57.2% CAGR vs -18.8%).
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.IDREarnings & Financial Report
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is a U.S.-based natural resource company focused on the exploration, development, and production of critical and strategic minerals. Primarily operating in Idaho, it targets rare earth elements, gold, silver, and other high-demand minerals, supplying products to the clean energy, defense, and industrial manufacturing sectors across North America.
KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. is a specialized real estate finance firm sponsored by global investment firm KKR. It primarily originates, acquires, and manages a portfolio of senior secured commercial real estate loans, mostly backed by high-quality institutional commercial properties across the United States, delivering stable risk-adjusted returns to investors via interest income from its diversified assets.
IDR vs KREF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.6M | $25.8M |
| Net Profit | $9.4M | $-26.2M |
| Gross Margin | 68.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 62.4% | -105.1% |
| Net Margin | 64.3% | -101.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 92.0% | -26.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 220.6% | -229.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.62 | $-0.49 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $14.6M | $25.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.5M | $30.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | $31.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.6M | $35.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.1M | $40.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $39.1M |
| Q4 25 | $9.4M | $-26.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $-29.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9M | $20.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $25.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $-3.1M |
| Q4 25 | 68.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 57.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 62.4% | -105.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.4% | 50.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.6% | -101.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | -18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.2% | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.4% | -19.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.2% | 63.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.3% | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | 64.3% | -101.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.8% | 54.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.2% | -98.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.1% | -15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.5% | 57.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | -20.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.2% | 63.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.8% | -7.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.62 | $-0.49 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $-0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.12 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | $0.29 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.17 | $-0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $84.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $108.2M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $116.2M | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.02× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $84.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $204.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $107.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $106.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $104.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $108.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3M | $107.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3M | $106.5M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $108.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.6M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $116.2M | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.1M | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.7M | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.1M | $6.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.0M | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.8M | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.2M | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.7M | $7.3B |
| Q4 25 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.15× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $10.7M | $72.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 56.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 17.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.15× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $12.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $72.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4M | $18.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5M | $21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | $15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $132.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $30.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | $34.5M |
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $709.8K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 56.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.81× | 1.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.50× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.08× | 6.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.22× | 1.19× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.19× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
