vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. (IDR) and LCNB CORP (LCNB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LCNB CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.9M vs $14.6M, roughly 1.6× Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 64.3% vs 23.7%, a 40.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (92.0% vs 5.1%). LCNB CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($33.4M vs $8.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (57.2% CAGR vs 15.7%).
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.IDREarnings & Financial Report
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is a U.S.-based natural resource company focused on the exploration, development, and production of critical and strategic minerals. Primarily operating in Idaho, it targets rare earth elements, gold, silver, and other high-demand minerals, supplying products to the clean energy, defense, and industrial manufacturing sectors across North America.
LCNB Corp is a United States-based financial holding company that operates through its national bank subsidiary, providing a full suite of retail and commercial banking products and services including deposit accounts, various loan products, wealth management, and insurance solutions primarily to individual consumers, small and medium-sized enterprises and local community organizations across regional markets in Ohio.
IDR vs LCNB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.6M | $23.9M |
| Net Profit | $9.4M | $5.7M |
| Gross Margin | 68.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 62.4% | 29.2% |
| Net Margin | 64.3% | 23.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 92.0% | 5.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 220.6% | -7.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.62 | $0.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $14.6M | $23.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $23.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.5M | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.6M | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2M | $21.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.1M | $19.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $17.8M |
| Q4 25 | $9.4M | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $4.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9M | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $925.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $1.9M |
| Q4 25 | 68.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 57.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 62.4% | 29.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.4% | 35.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.6% | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | 25.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.2% | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.4% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.2% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.3% | 12.5% |
| Q4 25 | 64.3% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.8% | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.2% | 26.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.1% | 21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.5% | 27.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.8% | 10.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.62 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $0.49 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $0.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | $0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.12 | $0.31 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.17 | $0.15 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $21.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.3M | $104.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $108.2M | $273.9M |
| Total Assets | $116.2M | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.02× | 0.38× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $35.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $49.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $37.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $35.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $39.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3M | $34.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3M | $33.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3M | $104.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $104.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $105.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $104.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7M | $155.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9M | $155.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $162.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3M | $162.6M |
| Q4 25 | $108.2M | $273.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.3M | $269.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.3M | $263.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.8M | $258.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.7M | $253.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.1M | $253.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.4M | $245.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.6M | $233.7M |
| Q4 25 | $116.2M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.1M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.7M | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.1M | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.0M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.8M | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.2M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.7M | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | 0.02× | 0.38× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.07× | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.09× | 0.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.05× | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.09× | 0.61× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | 0.66× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.15× | 0.70× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $10.7M | $34.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.2M | $33.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 56.0% | 140.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 17.7% | 4.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.15× | 6.08× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $12.4M | $54.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $34.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4M | $14.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $93.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $54.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | $-11.9M |
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | $33.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $709.8K | $13.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $89.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9M | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $53.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | $-12.8M |
| Q4 25 | 56.0% | 140.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 57.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.5% | 23.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 394.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.4% | 49.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.7% | 278.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.3% | -71.8% |
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.5% | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.15× | 6.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.81× | 2.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | 0.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.50× | 0.48× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.08× | 15.23× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 2.63× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.22× | 59.35× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.19× | -6.24× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
