vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. (IDR) and Owlet, Inc. (OWLT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Owlet, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.6M vs $14.6M, roughly 1.8× Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 64.3% vs -34.6%, a 98.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (92.0% vs 29.6%). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.2M vs $-651.0K). Over the past eight quarters, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (57.2% CAGR vs 34.2%).
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.IDREarnings & Financial Report
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is a U.S.-based natural resource company focused on the exploration, development, and production of critical and strategic minerals. Primarily operating in Idaho, it targets rare earth elements, gold, silver, and other high-demand minerals, supplying products to the clean energy, defense, and industrial manufacturing sectors across North America.
Owlet, Inc. is a pediatric health technology firm that develops smart wearable monitoring products for infants, most notably its signature smart sock that tracks real-time heart rate, oxygen levels, and sleep metrics. It serves global consumer markets across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific, distributing products via direct-to-consumer e-commerce and partnered retail outlets, focused on supporting parental peace of mind and infant health safety.
IDR vs OWLT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.6M | $26.6M |
| Net Profit | $9.4M | $-9.2M |
| Gross Margin | 68.5% | 47.6% |
| Operating Margin | 62.4% | -18.4% |
| Net Margin | 64.3% | -34.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 92.0% | 29.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 220.6% | -1.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.62 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $14.6M | $26.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $32.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.5M | $26.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | $21.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.6M | $20.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2M | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.1M | $20.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $14.8M |
| Q4 25 | $9.4M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $-37.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | 68.5% | 47.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.6% | 50.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 57.8% | 51.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.8% | 53.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.3% | 53.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.7% | 52.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.2% | 49.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.1% | 44.4% |
| Q4 25 | 62.4% | -18.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.6% | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | -12.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.2% | -36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.4% | -21.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.2% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.3% | -39.0% |
| Q4 25 | 64.3% | -34.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.8% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.2% | -144.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.1% | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.5% | -44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | -25.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.2% | -5.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.8% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.62 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $-2.37 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | $0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.12 | $-0.61 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.17 | $-0.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $35.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $108.2M | $19.0M |
| Total Assets | $116.2M | $85.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.02× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $35.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $23.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $21.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3M | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3M | $18.4M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3M | $4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $108.2M | $19.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.3M | $-54.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.3M | $-59.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.8M | $-25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.7M | $-29.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.1M | $-21.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.4M | $-33.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.6M | $-32.9M |
| Q4 25 | $116.2M | $85.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.1M | $74.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.7M | $63.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.1M | $51.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.0M | $49.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.8M | $56.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.2M | $45.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.7M | $43.8M |
| Q4 25 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.15× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $10.7M | $-452.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.2M | $-651.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 56.0% | -2.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 17.7% | 0.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.15× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $12.4M | $-11.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $-452.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | $-3.4M |
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | $-651.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $709.8K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 56.0% | -2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.5% | -8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | -28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.4% | -33.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.7% | -16.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.5% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.81× | -0.52× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.50× | -1.96× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.22× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.19× | -1.03× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IDR
Segment breakdown not available.
OWLT
| US | $22.7M | 85% |
| Non Us | $3.2M | 12% |
| Other | $651.0K | 2% |
