vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. (IDR) and Snail, Inc. (SNAL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Snail, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.1M vs $14.6M, roughly 1.7× Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 64.3% vs -3.4%, a 67.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (92.0% vs -4.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (57.2% CAGR vs 33.4%).
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.IDREarnings & Financial Report
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is a U.S.-based natural resource company focused on the exploration, development, and production of critical and strategic minerals. Primarily operating in Idaho, it targets rare earth elements, gold, silver, and other high-demand minerals, supplying products to the clean energy, defense, and industrial manufacturing sectors across North America.
Suzhou Snail Digital Technology Co., Ltd., doing business as Snail, is a Chinese video game company and a Virtual Network Operator headquartered in Suzhou, China, which has branches Snail Games and Snail Mobile. Its division, Snail USA, markets Snail Games products in North America, South America, & Europe. Snail Games products include massively multiplayer online (MMOs), real-time strategy (RTS), and casual games. Its global registered user base has reached over 70 million accounts. The U.S....
IDR vs SNAL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.6M | $25.1M |
| Net Profit | $9.4M | $-862.2K |
| Gross Margin | 68.5% | 38.3% |
| Operating Margin | 62.4% | -6.0% |
| Net Margin | 64.3% | -3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 92.0% | -4.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 220.6% | -177.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.62 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $14.6M | $25.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.5M | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | $20.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.6M | $26.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2M | $22.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.1M | $21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $14.1M |
| Q4 25 | $9.4M | $-862.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $-16.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | $235.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $-1.8M |
| Q4 25 | 68.5% | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 57.8% | 31.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.8% | 29.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.3% | 43.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.7% | 38.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.2% | 37.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.1% | 14.7% |
| Q4 25 | 62.4% | -6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.4% | -71.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.6% | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | -20.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.2% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.2% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.3% | -15.6% |
| Q4 25 | 64.3% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.8% | -56.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.2% | -74.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.1% | -9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.5% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.2% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.8% | -12.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.62 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.12 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.17 | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $8.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.3M | $14.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $108.2M | $-16.4M |
| Total Assets | $116.2M | $59.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.02× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3M | $16.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7M | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9M | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $5.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3M | $6.5M |
| Q4 25 | $108.2M | $-16.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.3M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.3M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.8M | $9.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.7M | $9.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.1M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.4M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.6M | $5.6M |
| Q4 25 | $116.2M | $59.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.1M | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.7M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.1M | $64.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.0M | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.8M | $66.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.2M | $75.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.7M | $78.3M |
| Q4 25 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.09× | 0.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.05× | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.09× | 0.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | 0.73× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.15× | 1.16× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $10.7M | $-5.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 56.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 17.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.15× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $12.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | $764.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $206.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | $6.8M |
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $709.8K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 56.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.50× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.08× | -3.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | -21.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.22× | 0.09× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.19× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IDR
Segment breakdown not available.
SNAL
| Pc | $14.7M | 59% |
| Platform Three | $5.2M | 21% |
| Platform Two | $3.3M | 13% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer Mobile Sale | $1.6M | 6% |
