vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. (IDR) and Velo3D, Inc. (VELO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.6M vs $9.4M, roughly 1.5× Velo3D, Inc.). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 64.3% vs -231.9%, a 296.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (92.0% vs -25.2%). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.2M vs $-8.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (57.2% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.IDREarnings & Financial Report
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is a U.S.-based natural resource company focused on the exploration, development, and production of critical and strategic minerals. Primarily operating in Idaho, it targets rare earth elements, gold, silver, and other high-demand minerals, supplying products to the clean energy, defense, and industrial manufacturing sectors across North America.
Velo3D, Inc. develops and sells advanced end-to-end metal additive manufacturing (3D printing) solutions, comprising industrial-grade printers, specialized processing software, and high-performance metal materials. It primarily serves global aerospace, defense, energy, semiconductor and industrial manufacturing markets, enabling customers to produce complex, high-precision metal parts that are difficult to manufacture with traditional methods.
IDR vs VELO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.6M | $9.4M |
| Net Profit | $9.4M | $-21.9M |
| Gross Margin | 68.5% | -73.6% |
| Operating Margin | 62.4% | -231.0% |
| Net Margin | 64.3% | -231.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 92.0% | -25.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 220.6% | -2.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.62 | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $14.6M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.5M | $13.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | $9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.6M | $12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.1M | $10.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $9.8M |
| Q4 25 | $9.4M | $-21.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $-13.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $-25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9M | $-21.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | $-21.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $935.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $-27.5M |
| Q4 25 | 68.5% | -73.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.6% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 57.8% | -11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.8% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.3% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.7% | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.2% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.1% | -28.8% |
| Q4 25 | 62.4% | -231.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.4% | -73.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.6% | -85.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | -123.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.2% | -167.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.4% | -213.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.2% | -187.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.3% | -211.1% |
| Q4 25 | 64.3% | -231.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.8% | -82.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.2% | -97.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.1% | -268.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.5% | -168.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | -265.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.2% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.8% | -281.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.62 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $-0.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $-0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | $-1.87 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | $7.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.12 | $-35.52 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | $1.65 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.17 | $-55.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $39.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.3M | $31.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $108.2M | $38.2M |
| Total Assets | $116.2M | $105.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.02× | 0.81× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $854.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3M | $10.9M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3M | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $22.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $21.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7M | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9M | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3M | $44.0M |
| Q4 25 | $108.2M | $38.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.3M | $29.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.3M | $21.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.8M | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.7M | $39.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.1M | $34.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.4M | $52.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.6M | $45.5M |
| Q4 25 | $116.2M | $105.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.1M | $93.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.7M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.1M | $91.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.0M | $89.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.8M | $110.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.2M | $116.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.7M | $136.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.02× | 0.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.07× | 1.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.09× | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.05× | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.09× | 0.94× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.15× | 0.97× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $10.7M | $-7.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.2M | $-8.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 56.0% | -88.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 17.7% | 6.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.15× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $12.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | $-12.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | $-20.5M |
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | $-8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $709.8K | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | $-20.5M |
| Q4 25 | 56.0% | -88.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | -46.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.5% | -22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | -17.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.4% | -24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.7% | -77.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.3% | -209.8% |
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.8% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.5% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.50× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.22× | -8.52× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.19× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
