vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IDEAYA Biosciences, Inc. (IDYA) and National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IDEAYA Biosciences, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($207.8M vs $187.0M, roughly 1.1× National Storage Affiliates Trust). IDEAYA Biosciences, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.4% vs 12.2%, a 45.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. National Storage Affiliates Trust produced more free cash flow last quarter ($299.8M vs $142.2M).
IDEAYA Biosciences, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on oncology, developing targeted therapies and synthetic lethality treatments for patients with genetically defined cancers. It advances a pipeline of candidates across multiple tumor types, partnering with industry stakeholders to accelerate global access to innovative cancer care solutions.
National Storage Affiliates Trust is a U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust focused on self-storage assets. It owns, operates and acquires self-storage facilities across dozens of U.S. states, offering secure storage solutions for residential and commercial customers.
IDYA vs NSA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $207.8M | $187.0M |
| Net Profit | $119.2M | $22.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 72.5% |
| Operating Margin | 52.2% | 20.2% |
| Net Margin | 57.4% | 12.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -1.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 330.1% | 36.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.33 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $187.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $207.8M | $188.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $188.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $188.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $190.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $193.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | $190.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $0 | $196.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $22.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.2M | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $19.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-51.8M | $18.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-52.8M | $17.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-39.6M | $59.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 72.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 70.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 70.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 70.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 72.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 72.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 72.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 72.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.2% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 48.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.4% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 30.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.33 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.60 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.68 | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.53 | $0.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $786.9M | $23.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $946.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $786.9M | $26.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $26.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $50.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $920.0M | $69.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $701.7M | $59.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $698.8M | $64.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $946.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $973.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $986.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $931.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $935.3M | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $973.7M | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $961.5M | $5.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $142.2M | $338.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $142.2M | $299.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 68.4% | 160.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 20.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.19× | 14.79× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $13.5M | $541.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $338.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.2M | $100.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $79.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $85.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $363.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-49.2M | $105.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-32.9M | $83.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-43.8M | $94.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $299.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.2M | $88.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $79.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $344.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-49.7M | $101.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-33.9M | $79.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-45.1M | $88.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 160.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 68.4% | 46.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 42.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 181.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 52.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 45.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.79× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.19× | 5.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.65× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.88× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.59× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.