vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IDEAYA Biosciences, Inc. (IDYA) and Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IDEAYA Biosciences, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($207.8M vs $148.3M, roughly 1.4× Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.). IDEAYA Biosciences, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.4% vs 5.5%, a 51.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. IDEAYA Biosciences, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($142.2M vs $-11.3M).
IDEAYA Biosciences, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on oncology, developing targeted therapies and synthetic lethality treatments for patients with genetically defined cancers. It advances a pipeline of candidates across multiple tumor types, partnering with industry stakeholders to accelerate global access to innovative cancer care solutions.
Shoals Technologies Group is a leading provider of electrical balance of systems solutions for renewable energy and e-mobility. It supplies connectivity components for solar projects, energy storage systems and EV charging infrastructure, serving clients across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.
IDYA vs SHLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $207.8M | $148.3M |
| Net Profit | $119.2M | $8.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 31.6% |
| Operating Margin | 52.2% | 11.7% |
| Net Margin | 57.4% | 5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 38.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 330.1% | 3.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.33 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $148.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $207.8M | $135.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $110.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $80.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $107.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $102.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | $99.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $0 | $90.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.2M | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $13.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-282.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-51.8M | $-267.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-52.8M | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-39.6M | $4.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 40.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.2% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.4% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.33 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.60 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.68 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.53 | $0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $786.9M | $7.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $600.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $904.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $786.9M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $23.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $920.0M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $701.7M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $698.8M | $15.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $141.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $141.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $141.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $146.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $168.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $600.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $589.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $575.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $558.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $556.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $545.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $931.7M | $544.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $935.3M | $554.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $904.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $851.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $795.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $788.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $793.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $801.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $973.7M | $788.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $961.5M | $825.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.30× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $142.2M | $-4.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $142.2M | $-11.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 68.4% | -7.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 4.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.19× | -0.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $13.5M | $-16.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.2M | $19.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-49.2M | $15.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-32.9M | $37.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-43.8M | $12.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-11.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.2M | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-49.7M | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-33.9M | $35.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-45.1M | $10.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | -7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 68.4% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -23.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.19× | 1.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.79× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.21× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.69× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IDYA
Segment breakdown not available.
SHLS
| System Solutions | $122.0M | 82% |
| Components | $26.3M | 18% |
