vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and Occidental Petroleum (OXY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Occidental Petroleum is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $871.0M, roughly 1.9× IES Holdings, Inc.). IES Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.5% vs 6.9%, a 3.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IES Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.2% vs -75.8%). Occidental Petroleum produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.9B vs $-18.9M). Over the past eight quarters, IES Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.1% CAGR vs -50.4%).
IES Holdings, Inc., formerly known as Integrated Electrical Services, Inc., designs and installs integrated electrical and technology systems and provides infrastructure products and services to a variety of end markets, including data centers, residential housing, and commercial and industrial facilities.
Occidental Petroleum Corporation is an American company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the United States and the Middle East as well as petrochemical manufacturing in the United States, Canada, and Chile. It is incorporated under the Delaware General Corporation Law and headquartered in Houston. The company ranked 183rd on the 2021 Fortune 500 based on its 2020 revenues and 670th on the 2021 Forbes Global 2000.
IESC vs OXY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $871.0M | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $91.8M | $114.0M |
| Gross Margin | 25.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | -6.5% |
| Net Margin | 10.5% | 6.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 16.2% | -75.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 59.1% | 195.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.51 | $-0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $871.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $897.8M | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $890.2M | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $834.0M | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $749.5M | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $775.8M | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $768.4M | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $705.7M | $6.7B |
| Q4 25 | $91.8M | $114.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.3M | $842.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.3M | $468.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.6M | $945.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.7M | $-120.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.8M | $888.0M |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.0% | 87.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.9% | 86.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.0% | 88.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.8% | 89.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.0% | 88.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.3% | 87.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.3% | 89.0% |
| Q4 25 | 11.2% | -6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 17.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.6% | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.1% | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.0% | -2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.0% | 15.0% |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.4% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.9% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | -1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 13.2% |
| Q4 25 | $4.51 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.99 | $0.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.81 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.50 | $0.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.72 | $-0.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.06 | $0.98 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.67 | $1.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.29 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $258.7M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $20.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $961.1M | $36.0B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $84.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.57× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $258.7M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $231.8M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.3M | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.3M | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.9M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $106.0M | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | $20.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $20.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $24.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $25.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.5B |
| Q4 25 | $961.1M | $36.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $884.0M | $36.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $781.4M | $35.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $705.8M | $34.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $652.4M | $34.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $611.1M | $34.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $567.5M | $32.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $534.8M | $30.8B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $84.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $83.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $84.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $85.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $85.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $85.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $76.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $74.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.60× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $27.7M | $2.6B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-18.9M | $1.9B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.2% | 113.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.3% | 45.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.30× | 23.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $175.9M | $4.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.7M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.0M | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.8M | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.3M | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.8M | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.9M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.7M | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | $-18.9M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $112.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $74.8M | $962.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.9M | $240.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.5M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.4M | $623.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.9M | $224.0M |
| Q4 25 | -2.2% | 113.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | 15.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | 23.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 28.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.8% | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 45.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 27.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | 26.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 24.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 26.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 26.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.30× | 23.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.29× | 3.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.16× | 6.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.34× | 2.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.42× | 3.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.24× | 2.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.59× | 2.26× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IESC
| Communications | $351.9M | 40% |
| Single Family Electrical Contracts | $137.0M | 16% |
| Custom Engineered Solutions | $116.0M | 13% |
| Commercialand Industrial | $94.8M | 11% |
| Single Family Contracts Plumbing HVAC | $82.9M | 10% |
| Multi Familyand Other | $64.2M | 7% |
| Industrial Services | $24.2M | 3% |
OXY
Segment breakdown not available.
