vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Infobird Co., Ltd (IFBD) and Mega Matrix Inc (MPU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Mega Matrix Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.1M vs $3.4M, roughly 1.8× Infobird Co., Ltd). Infobird Co., Ltd runs the higher net margin — -46.7% vs -177.4%, a 130.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Infobird Co., Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17118.0% vs -40.9%).
Infobird Co., Ltd. is a China-based technology firm specializing in AI-powered customer engagement and smart customer service solutions. It serves clients across e-commerce, finance, telecommunications, and internet service sectors, offering cloud-based SaaS tools, intelligent call center systems, and customized digital operation support to help enterprises boost service efficiency and customer satisfaction.
IFBD vs MPU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.4M | $6.1M |
| Net Profit | $-1.6M | $-10.8M |
| Gross Margin | 37.2% | 47.7% |
| Operating Margin | -31.8% | -156.3% |
| Net Margin | -46.7% | -177.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 17118.0% | -40.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -98.1% | -291.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.41 | $-0.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $6.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4M | $7.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.3M |
| Q3 25 | — | $-10.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.6M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.8M |
| Q3 25 | — | 47.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.2% | 58.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 58.5% |
| Q3 25 | — | -156.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -31.8% | -21.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -32.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -26.0% |
| Q3 25 | — | -177.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -46.7% | -20.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -32.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -26.8% |
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.41 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $698.0K | $9.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $66.7M | $37.4M |
| Total Assets | $72.4M | $42.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $698.0K | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.9M |
| Q3 25 | — | $37.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $66.7M | $10.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.8M |
| Q3 25 | — | $42.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1M | $-3.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
