vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Information Services Group Inc. (III) and Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Industrial Logistics Properties Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($113.9M vs $61.2M, roughly 1.9× Information Services Group Inc.). Information Services Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs -1.6%, a 5.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Information Services Group Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.9% vs 3.1%). Industrial Logistics Properties Trust produced more free cash flow last quarter ($42.0M vs $4.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Industrial Logistics Properties Trust's revenue compounded faster (0.7% CAGR vs -2.4%).
EBSCO Information Services, headquartered in Ipswich, Massachusetts, is a division of EBSCO Industries Inc., a private company headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. EBSCO provides products and services to libraries of many types around the world. Its products include EBSCONET, a complete e-resource management system, and EBSCOhost, which supplies a fee-based online research service with 375 full-text databases, a collection of 600,000-plus ebooks, subject indexes, point-of-care medical refere...
Industrial Logistics Properties Trust is a real estate investment trust that owns and operates a portfolio of industrial and logistics real estate assets primarily across the United States. Its holdings include distribution centers, warehouses, and last-mile delivery properties, serving e-commerce, retail, manufacturing and supply chain operators to meet their storage and logistics operation needs.
III vs ILPT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $61.2M | $113.9M |
| Net Profit | $2.6M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 44.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | -22.1% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | -1.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.9% | 3.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -14.1% | 92.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.06 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $61.2M | $113.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.4M | $110.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.6M | $112.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $59.6M | $111.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $110.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $108.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.3M | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.3M | $112.2M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1M | $-21.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $-21.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | $-21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | $-24.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $-25.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-23.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.4M | $-23.4M |
| Q4 25 | 44.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | -22.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | -29.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | -30.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | -26.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | -31.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | -33.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.7% | -32.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.7% | -31.7% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | -19.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | -19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | -19.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | -21.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | -22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | -20.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | -20.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.06 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $-0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.36 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $28.7M | $94.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $94.7M | $489.7M |
| Total Assets | $211.0M | $5.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 8.56× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.7M | $94.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.7M | $83.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.2M | $58.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | $108.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.1M | $131.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.7M | $153.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | $146.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.0M | $128.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.3B |
| Q4 25 | $94.7M | $489.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | $494.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.1M | $519.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.0M | $539.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.3M | $562.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.6M | $585.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.5M | $618.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $95.6M | $643.2M |
| Q4 25 | $211.0M | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $213.3M | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.7M | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $202.4M | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.5M | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.1M | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $235.3M | $5.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $234.2M | $5.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.09× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.96× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.96× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.70× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.1M | $60.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.3M | $42.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.0% | 36.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 16.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.94× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $25.0M | $79.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $60.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $22.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9M | $18.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $978.0K | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $10.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | $8.0M |
| Q4 25 | $4.3M | $42.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | $15.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0K | $5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $9.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3M | $5.9M |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 36.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | -5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | 5.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.94× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.62× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.46× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.15× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
