vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Information Services Group Inc. (III) and Katapult Holdings, Inc. (KPLT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Katapult Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($73.9M vs $61.2M, roughly 1.2× Information Services Group Inc.). Katapult Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 26.8% vs 4.3%, a 22.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Katapult Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.3% vs 5.9%). Information Services Group Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.3M vs $-12.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Katapult Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs -2.4%).
EBSCO Information Services, headquartered in Ipswich, Massachusetts, is a division of EBSCO Industries Inc., a private company headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. EBSCO provides products and services to libraries of many types around the world. Its products include EBSCONET, a complete e-resource management system, and EBSCOhost, which supplies a fee-based online research service with 375 full-text databases, a collection of 600,000-plus ebooks, subject indexes, point-of-care medical refere...
Katapult Holdings, Inc. is a U.S.-based fintech company that provides accessible point-of-sale lease-to-purchase solutions for consumers with limited or no traditional credit history. It partners with a wide network of e-commerce platforms and brick-and-mortar retail merchants across segments including electronics, furniture and home goods to offer flexible payment plans for customers to obtain needed products.
III vs KPLT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $61.2M | $73.9M |
| Net Profit | $2.6M | $19.8M |
| Gross Margin | 44.8% | 15.6% |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | -1.4% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 26.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.9% | 17.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -14.1% | 307.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.06 | $3.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $61.2M | $73.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.4M | $74.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.6M | $71.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $59.6M | $71.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $60.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.3M | $58.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.3M | $65.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6M | $19.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-6.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.4M | $-570.0K |
| Q4 25 | 44.8% | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.2% | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.2% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.1% | 19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.5% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.4% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.1% | 25.3% |
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | -1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | -2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | -7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.7% | -4.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.7% | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 26.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | -6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | -10.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | -7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | -15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | -14.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | -11.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | -0.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.06 | $3.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $-0.94 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $-1.63 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $-2.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $-2.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | $-1.61 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $28.7M | $22.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $94.7M | $-38.1M |
| Total Assets | $211.0M | $107.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.7M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.7M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.2M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.1M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.7M | $25.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | $33.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.0M | $31.2M |
| Q4 25 | $94.7M | $-38.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | $-58.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.1M | $-54.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.0M | $-51.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.3M | $-46.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.6M | $-40.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.5M | $-32.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $95.6M | $-27.5M |
| Q4 25 | $211.0M | $107.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $213.3M | $85.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.7M | $90.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $202.4M | $88.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.5M | $93.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.1M | $92.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $235.3M | $106.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $234.2M | $106.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.1M | $-11.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.3M | $-12.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.0% | -16.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.94× | -0.60× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $25.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $978.0K | $3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $-32.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $-628.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | $4.3M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0K | $3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | $-32.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $-653.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | -16.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | -51.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | -9.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.94× | -0.60× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.62× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.46× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.15× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
