vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Information Services Group Inc. (III) and CS Disco, Inc. (LAW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Information Services Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($61.2M vs $41.9M, roughly 1.5× CS Disco, Inc.). Information Services Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.4% vs -23.0%, a 27.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CS Disco, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.3% vs 2.7%). Over the past eight quarters, CS Disco, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.9% CAGR vs -2.4%).
EBSCO Information Services, headquartered in Ipswich, Massachusetts, is a division of EBSCO Industries Inc., a private company headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. EBSCO provides products and services to libraries of many types around the world. Its products include EBSCONET, a complete e-resource management system, and EBSCOhost, which supplies a fee-based online research service with 375 full-text databases, a collection of 600,000-plus ebooks, subject indexes, point-of-care medical refere...
CS Disco, Inc. is a leading legal technology provider that develops cloud-based software solutions for legal practitioners. Its core offerings include e-discovery, document review, case management, and legal workflow automation tools, serving law firms, corporate legal teams, and government legal departments primarily in North America.
III vs LAW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $61.2M | $41.9M |
| Net Profit | $2.7M | $-9.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 74.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.2% | 1.7% |
| Net Margin | 4.4% | -23.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.7% | 14.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 82.5% | 15.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $-0.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $61.2M | $41.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $61.2M | $41.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.4M | $40.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.6M | $38.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $59.6M | $36.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $37.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $36.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.3M | $36.0M |
| Q1 26 | $2.7M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | $-25.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-10.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 74.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 44.8% | 75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.2% | 75.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.2% | 74.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.1% | 74.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.5% | 74.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.4% | 73.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | 74.2% |
| Q1 26 | 8.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | -22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | -35.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | -31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | -34.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | -70.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | -30.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.7% | -34.4% |
| Q1 26 | 4.4% | -23.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | -20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | -33.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | -28.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | -31.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | -68.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | -25.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | -30.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.05 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.06 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $-0.43 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | $-0.18 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $103.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $123.9M |
| Total Assets | — | $162.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $103.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.7M | $114.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.7M | $113.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.2M | $114.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | $118.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.1M | $129.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.7M | $126.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | $130.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $123.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $94.7M | $128.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | $130.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.1M | $137.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.0M | $142.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.3M | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.6M | $167.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.5M | $170.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $162.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $211.0M | $173.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $213.3M | $174.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.7M | $164.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $202.4M | $168.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.5M | $180.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.1M | $194.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $235.3M | $198.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-11.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-11.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $762.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $-979.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $978.0K | $-10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $-650.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.3M | $255.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0K | $-11.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | $1.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $-1.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | -5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | -13.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | -30.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | -3.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 1.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.94× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.62× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.46× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.15× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
