vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Information Services Group Inc. (III) and Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings, Inc. (LVLU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($66.1M vs $61.2M, roughly 1.1× Information Services Group Inc.). Information Services Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.4% vs -48.2%, a 52.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Information Services Group Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.7% vs -11.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Information Services Group Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-2.4% CAGR vs -14.7%).
EBSCO Information Services, headquartered in Ipswich, Massachusetts, is a division of EBSCO Industries Inc., a private company headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. EBSCO provides products and services to libraries of many types around the world. Its products include EBSCONET, a complete e-resource management system, and EBSCOhost, which supplies a fee-based online research service with 375 full-text databases, a collection of 600,000-plus ebooks, subject indexes, point-of-care medical refere...
Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings, Inc. is a direct-to-consumer women's fashion retailer offering affordable, trendy apparel, footwear, and accessories. It primarily serves Gen Z and millennial consumers across North America, operating mainly via its e-commerce platform, with limited pop-up physical locations to boost customer engagement.
III vs LVLU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $61.2M | $66.1M |
| Net Profit | $2.7M | $-31.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.9% |
| Operating Margin | 8.2% | -52.8% |
| Net Margin | 4.4% | -48.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.7% | -11.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 82.5% | -340.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $-13.46 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $61.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $61.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $59.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $66.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $80.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.3M | $92.0M |
| Q1 26 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | $-31.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $-6.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-10.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 44.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.5% | 37.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.4% | 38.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | 45.5% |
| Q1 26 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | -52.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | -8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.7% | -4.9% |
| Q1 26 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | -48.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | -8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | -11.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $-13.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $-2.47 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | $-3.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $4.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $13.4M |
| Total Assets | — | $108.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.1M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.7M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | $1.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $94.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.3M | $13.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.6M | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.5M | $48.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $211.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $213.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $202.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.5M | $108.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.1M | $153.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $235.3M | $145.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-2.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-2.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -3.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $978.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $3.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $3.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | -3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | -7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 3.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 0.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.94× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.62× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.46× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.15× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
III
Segment breakdown not available.
LVLU
| Single Reportable Segment | $63.0M | 95% |
| Other | $2.4M | 4% |
| Stored Value Cards | $750.0K | 1% |
