vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Information Services Group Inc. (III) and MFA FINANCIAL, INC. (MFA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Information Services Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($61.2M vs $55.5M, roughly 1.1× MFA FINANCIAL, INC.). On growth, MFA FINANCIAL, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.2% vs 5.9%). Over the past eight quarters, MFA FINANCIAL, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (7.7% CAGR vs -2.4%).
EBSCO Information Services, headquartered in Ipswich, Massachusetts, is a division of EBSCO Industries Inc., a private company headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. EBSCO provides products and services to libraries of many types around the world. Its products include EBSCONET, a complete e-resource management system, and EBSCOhost, which supplies a fee-based online research service with 375 full-text databases, a collection of 600,000-plus ebooks, subject indexes, point-of-care medical refere...
MFA Financial, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust (REIT) specializing in investing in and managing residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities, mortgage loans, and other real estate-related financial assets. It caters primarily to institutional and individual investors across the U.S., focusing on delivering stable risk-adjusted returns via rigorous asset screening and risk management frameworks.
III vs MFA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $61.2M | $55.5M |
| Net Profit | $2.6M | — |
| Gross Margin | 44.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | 97.9% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 5.9% | 9.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -14.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.06 | $0.43 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $61.2M | $55.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.4M | $56.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.6M | $61.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $59.6M | $57.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $50.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $50.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.3M | $53.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.3M | $47.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1M | $48.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $33.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | $41.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $48.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $41.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.4M | $23.2M |
| Q4 25 | 44.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | 97.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | 84.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 54.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | 70.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 98.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.7% | 79.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.7% | 50.7% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 84.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 54.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 71.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 95.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 78.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | 48.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.06 | $0.43 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $0.31 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $28.7M | $213.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $94.7M | $1.8B |
| Total Assets | $211.0M | $13.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.7M | $213.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.7M | $305.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.2M | $275.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | $253.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.1M | $338.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.7M | $305.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | $289.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.0M | $306.3M |
| Q4 25 | $94.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.1M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.6M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.5M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $95.6M | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | $211.0M | $13.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $213.3M | $12.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.7M | $11.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $202.4M | $11.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.5M | $11.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.1M | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $235.3M | $11.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $234.2M | $10.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.1M | $76.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.94× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $25.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $76.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $14.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9M | $38.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $978.0K | $-14.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $200.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $46.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | $53.5M |
| Q4 25 | $4.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.94× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.62× | 0.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.46× | 1.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | -0.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.15× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.66× | -0.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.