vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Information Services Group Inc. (III) and Prenetics Global Ltd (PRE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Prenetics Global Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($92.0M vs $61.2M, roughly 1.5× Information Services Group Inc.).
EBSCO Information Services, headquartered in Ipswich, Massachusetts, is a division of EBSCO Industries Inc., a private company headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. EBSCO provides products and services to libraries of many types around the world. Its products include EBSCONET, a complete e-resource management system, and EBSCOhost, which supplies a fee-based online research service with 375 full-text databases, a collection of 600,000-plus ebooks, subject indexes, point-of-care medical refere...
Prenetics (NASDAQ:PRE) is a health sciences company headquartered in Hong Kong, with a presence in the United States. It focuses on early detection, prevention, and treatment of diseases, particularly cancer.
III vs PRE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2023
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $61.2M | $92.0M |
| Net Profit | $2.7M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 39.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.2% | — |
| Net Margin | 4.4% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 2.7% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 82.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $61.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $61.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $59.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 44.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
