vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Information Services Group Inc. (III) and RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (RYTM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Information Services Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($61.2M vs $57.3M, roughly 1.1× RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.). Information Services Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs -83.0%, a 87.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (36.9% vs 5.9%). Over the past eight quarters, RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (48.5% CAGR vs -2.4%).
EBSCO Information Services, headquartered in Ipswich, Massachusetts, is a division of EBSCO Industries Inc., a private company headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. EBSCO provides products and services to libraries of many types around the world. Its products include EBSCONET, a complete e-resource management system, and EBSCOhost, which supplies a fee-based online research service with 375 full-text databases, a collection of 600,000-plus ebooks, subject indexes, point-of-care medical refere...
Rhythm Pharmaceuticals is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on developing and commercializing targeted therapies for rare genetic disorders causing severe unmanageable obesity, including POMC deficiency, LEPR deficiency, and Bardet-Biedl syndrome. It serves patients in North America and Europe who lack effective standard treatments for their chronic life-altering conditions.
III vs RYTM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $61.2M | $57.3M |
| Net Profit | $2.6M | $-47.5M |
| Gross Margin | 44.8% | 91.6% |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | -82.2% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | -83.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.9% | 36.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -14.1% | -9.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.06 | $-0.73 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $61.2M | $57.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.4M | $51.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.6M | $48.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $59.6M | $32.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $41.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $33.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.3M | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.3M | $26.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6M | $-47.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1M | $-52.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $-46.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | $-49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | $-43.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $-43.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-32.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.4M | $-141.4M |
| Q4 25 | 44.8% | 91.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.2% | 89.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.2% | 88.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.1% | 88.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.5% | 90.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.4% | 88.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | 89.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.1% | 89.2% |
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | -82.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | -102.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | -93.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | -143.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | -98.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | -132.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.7% | -139.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.7% | -538.7% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | -83.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | -103.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | -96.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | -151.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | -103.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | -131.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | -110.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | -544.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.06 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $-0.82 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $-0.75 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $-0.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $-0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | $-0.55 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $-2.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $28.7M | $388.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $94.7M | $139.1M |
| Total Assets | $211.0M | $480.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.7M | $388.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.7M | $416.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.2M | $291.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | $314.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.1M | $320.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.7M | $298.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | $319.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.0M | $201.2M |
| Q4 25 | $94.7M | $139.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | $148.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.1M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.0M | $18.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.3M | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.6M | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.5M | $39.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $95.6M | $61.6M |
| Q4 25 | $211.0M | $480.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $213.3M | $506.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.7M | $372.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $202.4M | $386.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.5M | $392.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.1M | $363.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $235.3M | $381.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $234.2M | $258.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.1M | $-25.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.94× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $25.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $-25.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9M | $-23.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $978.0K | $-40.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8M | $-25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $-29.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | $-40.7M |
| Q4 25 | $4.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.94× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.62× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.46× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.15× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
