vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Information Services Group Inc. (III) and Neuronetics, Inc. (STIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Information Services Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($61.2M vs $41.8M, roughly 1.5× Neuronetics, Inc.). Information Services Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs -17.2%, a 21.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Neuronetics, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (85.7% vs 5.9%). Information Services Group Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.3M vs $692.0K). Over the past eight quarters, Neuronetics, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (54.9% CAGR vs -2.4%).
EBSCO Information Services, headquartered in Ipswich, Massachusetts, is a division of EBSCO Industries Inc., a private company headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. EBSCO provides products and services to libraries of many types around the world. Its products include EBSCONET, a complete e-resource management system, and EBSCOhost, which supplies a fee-based online research service with 375 full-text databases, a collection of 600,000-plus ebooks, subject indexes, point-of-care medical refere...
Neuronetics is a Malvern, PA based, publicly traded company incorporated in Delaware in April 2003, that develops non-invasive treatments for psychiatric disorders that have shown resistance or lack of improvement using traditional medicine. The treatments are based upon neuromodulation technology.
III vs STIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $61.2M | $41.8M |
| Net Profit | $2.6M | $-7.2M |
| Gross Margin | 44.8% | 52.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | -12.1% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | -17.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.9% | 85.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -14.1% | 43.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.06 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $61.2M | $41.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.4M | $37.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.6M | $38.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $59.6M | $32.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $22.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $18.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.3M | $16.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.3M | $17.4M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | $-12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | $-12.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $-13.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.4M | $-7.9M |
| Q4 25 | 44.8% | 52.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.2% | 45.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.2% | 46.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.1% | 49.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.5% | 66.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.4% | 75.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | 74.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.1% | 75.1% |
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | -12.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | -19.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | -21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | -34.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | -51.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | -41.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.7% | -51.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.7% | -39.4% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | -17.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | -24.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | -26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | -39.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | -56.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | -72.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | -59.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | -45.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.06 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $28.7M | $28.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $65.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $94.7M | $22.4M |
| Total Assets | $211.0M | $141.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 2.94× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.7M | $28.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.7M | $28.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.2M | $11.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | $20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.1M | $18.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.7M | $20.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | $42.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.0M | $47.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $65.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $65.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $55.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $55.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $55.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $46.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $59.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $59.4M |
| Q4 25 | $94.7M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.1M | $27.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.0M | $35.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.3M | $27.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.6M | $9.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.5M | $19.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $95.6M | $27.7M |
| Q4 25 | $211.0M | $141.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $213.3M | $145.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.7M | $134.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $202.4M | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.5M | $140.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $235.3M | $96.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $234.2M | $103.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.08× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.15× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.1M | $908.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.3M | $692.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.0% | 1.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.94× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $25.0M | $-21.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $908.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $-785.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $978.0K | $-17.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $-8.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | $-12.0M |
| Q4 25 | $4.3M | $692.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | $-899.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0K | $-17.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | $-8.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3M | $-12.4M |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | -2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | -9.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | -53.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | -38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | -31.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | -34.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | -71.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 2.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.94× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.62× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.46× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.15× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.