vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC (IIIN) and TWIN DISC INC (TWIN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($159.9M vs $90.2M, roughly 1.8× TWIN DISC INC). TWIN DISC INC runs the higher net margin — 24.8% vs 4.7%, a 20.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.3% vs 0.3%). TWIN DISC INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.2M vs $-2.2M). Over the past eight quarters, INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (12.0% CAGR vs 10.3%).

Insteel Industries Inc is a leading U.S. manufacturer of steel reinforcing products including welded wire reinforcement and steel fibers. It primarily serves non-residential construction, infrastructure, and precast concrete segments across North America, delivering high-performance reinforcement solutions for various construction projects.

Twin Disc, Inc. designs, manufactures, and distributes power transmission equipment for a wide range of applications, including marine, off-road vehicle, and industrial. The company was founded in 1918 to manufacture clutches for farm tractors. It is now a worldwide company with subsidiaries or sales offices in Asia, Europe, North America, Oceania, and South America.

IIIN vs TWIN — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
IIIN
IIIN
1.8× larger
IIIN
$159.9M
$90.2M
TWIN
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
IIIN
IIIN
+23.0% gap
IIIN
23.3%
0.3%
TWIN
Higher net margin
TWIN
TWIN
20.1% more per $
TWIN
24.8%
4.7%
IIIN
More free cash flow
TWIN
TWIN
$3.4M more FCF
TWIN
$1.2M
$-2.2M
IIIN
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
IIIN
IIIN
Annualised
IIIN
12.0%
10.3%
TWIN

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026

Metric
IIIN
IIIN
TWIN
TWIN
Revenue
$159.9M
$90.2M
Net Profit
$7.6M
$22.4M
Gross Margin
11.3%
24.8%
Operating Margin
6.0%
2.3%
Net Margin
4.7%
24.8%
Revenue YoY
23.3%
0.3%
Net Profit YoY
602.4%
2334.3%
EPS (diluted)
$0.39
$1.55

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
IIIN
IIIN
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
$159.9M
$90.2M
Q3 25
$177.4M
$80.0M
Q2 25
$179.9M
$96.7M
Q1 25
$160.7M
$81.2M
Q4 24
$129.7M
$89.9M
Q3 24
$134.3M
$72.9M
Q2 24
$145.8M
$84.4M
Q1 24
$127.4M
$74.2M
Net Profit
IIIN
IIIN
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
$7.6M
$22.4M
Q3 25
$14.6M
$-518.0K
Q2 25
$15.2M
$1.4M
Q1 25
$10.2M
$-1.5M
Q4 24
$1.1M
$919.0K
Q3 24
$4.7M
$-2.8M
Q2 24
$6.6M
$7.4M
Q1 24
$6.9M
$3.8M
Gross Margin
IIIN
IIIN
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
11.3%
24.8%
Q3 25
16.1%
28.7%
Q2 25
17.1%
31.0%
Q1 25
15.3%
26.7%
Q4 24
7.3%
24.1%
Q3 24
9.1%
26.5%
Q2 24
10.6%
29.7%
Q1 24
12.3%
28.2%
Operating Margin
IIIN
IIIN
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
6.0%
2.3%
Q3 25
10.8%
2.8%
Q2 25
11.0%
5.5%
Q1 25
8.3%
2.4%
Q4 24
1.1%
3.1%
Q3 24
4.5%
-0.2%
Q2 24
6.0%
5.6%
Q1 24
7.0%
4.9%
Net Margin
IIIN
IIIN
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
4.7%
24.8%
Q3 25
8.2%
-0.6%
Q2 25
8.4%
1.5%
Q1 25
6.4%
-1.8%
Q4 24
0.8%
1.0%
Q3 24
3.5%
-3.8%
Q2 24
4.5%
8.8%
Q1 24
5.4%
5.2%
EPS (diluted)
IIIN
IIIN
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
$0.39
$1.55
Q3 25
$0.74
$-0.04
Q2 25
$0.78
$0.10
Q1 25
$0.52
$-0.11
Q4 24
$0.06
$0.07
Q3 24
$0.24
$-0.20
Q2 24
$0.34
$0.54
Q1 24
$0.35
$0.27

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
IIIN
IIIN
TWIN
TWIN
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$15.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$44.5M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$358.8M
$184.5M
Total Assets
$456.1M
$384.0M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.24×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
IIIN
IIIN
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
$15.6M
Q3 25
$38.6M
Q2 25
$53.7M
Q1 25
$28.4M
Q4 24
$36.0M
Q3 24
$111.5M
Q2 24
$97.7M
Q1 24
$83.9M
Total Debt
IIIN
IIIN
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
$44.5M
Q3 25
$43.7M
Q2 25
$31.4M
Q1 25
$40.8M
Q4 24
$24.9M
Q3 24
$29.8M
Q2 24
$25.8M
Q1 24
$17.0M
Stockholders' Equity
IIIN
IIIN
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
$358.8M
$184.5M
Q3 25
$371.5M
$160.3M
Q2 25
$356.2M
$164.0M
Q1 25
$341.4M
$149.5M
Q4 24
$331.6M
$147.0M
Q3 24
$350.9M
$157.5M
Q2 24
$346.0M
$154.7M
Q1 24
$340.6M
$146.3M
Total Assets
IIIN
IIIN
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
$456.1M
$384.0M
Q3 25
$462.6M
$363.5M
Q2 25
$471.9M
$355.6M
Q1 25
$421.9M
$332.9M
Q4 24
$404.7M
$307.4M
Q3 24
$422.6M
$323.5M
Q2 24
$414.6M
$312.1M
Q1 24
$397.2M
$288.8M
Debt / Equity
IIIN
IIIN
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
0.24×
Q3 25
0.27×
Q2 25
0.19×
Q1 25
0.27×
Q4 24
0.17×
Q3 24
0.19×
Q2 24
0.17×
Q1 24
0.12×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
IIIN
IIIN
TWIN
TWIN
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-701.0K
$4.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-2.2M
$1.2M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-1.4%
1.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.9%
3.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-0.09×
0.20×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$439.0K
$-70.0K

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
IIIN
IIIN
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
$-701.0K
$4.6M
Q3 25
$-17.0M
$-7.5M
Q2 25
$28.5M
$16.4M
Q1 25
$-3.3M
$3.2M
Q4 24
$19.0M
$8.7M
Q3 24
$16.2M
$-4.3M
Q2 24
$18.8M
$11.4M
Q1 24
$1.4M
$6.2M
Free Cash Flow
IIIN
IIIN
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
$-2.2M
$1.2M
Q3 25
$-18.7M
$-11.0M
Q2 25
$26.9M
$8.7M
Q1 25
$-5.5M
$906.0K
Q4 24
$16.3M
$5.9M
Q3 24
$14.5M
$-6.7M
Q2 24
$15.5M
$10.3M
Q1 24
$-580.0K
$4.0M
FCF Margin
IIIN
IIIN
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
-1.4%
1.4%
Q3 25
-10.6%
-13.7%
Q2 25
15.0%
9.0%
Q1 25
-3.5%
1.1%
Q4 24
12.6%
6.5%
Q3 24
10.8%
-9.2%
Q2 24
10.7%
12.2%
Q1 24
-0.5%
5.5%
Capex Intensity
IIIN
IIIN
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
0.9%
3.7%
Q3 25
1.0%
4.3%
Q2 25
0.9%
8.0%
Q1 25
1.4%
2.8%
Q4 24
2.1%
3.1%
Q3 24
1.3%
3.2%
Q2 24
2.2%
1.3%
Q1 24
1.5%
2.9%
Cash Conversion
IIIN
IIIN
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
-0.09×
0.20×
Q3 25
-1.17×
Q2 25
1.88×
11.55×
Q1 25
-0.32×
Q4 24
17.56×
9.42×
Q3 24
3.48×
Q2 24
2.86×
1.54×
Q1 24
0.20×
1.63×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

IIIN
IIIN

Welded Wire Reinforcement$108.4M68%
PC Strand$51.6M32%

TWIN
TWIN

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons