vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV) and RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS INC (RIGL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($69.8M vs $52.7M, roughly 1.3× i3 Verticals, Inc.). RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS INC runs the higher net margin — 384.0% vs 0.9%, a 383.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.2% vs -14.6%). Over the past eight quarters, RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS INC's revenue compounded faster (53.7% CAGR vs -4.7%).
The Prusa i3 is a family of fused filament fabrication 3D printers, manufactured by Czech company Prusa Research under the trademarked name Original Prusa i3. Part of the RepRap project, Prusa i3 printers were called the most used 3D printer in the world in 2016. The first Prusa i3 was designed by Josef Průša in 2012, and was released as a commercial kit product in 2015. The latest model is available in both kit and factory assembled versions. The Prusa i3's comparable low cost and ease of co...
Rigel Pharmaceuticals Inc is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on developing and commercializing targeted small molecule therapies for autoimmune, inflammatory, and hematologic diseases. Its approved flagship product treats adult immune thrombocytopenia, with primary operations and core markets in the United States, addressing unmet medical needs for underserved patient groups.
IIIV vs RIGL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $52.7M | $69.8M |
| Net Profit | $484.0K | $268.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 91.5% |
| Operating Margin | 3.1% | 33.2% |
| Net Margin | 0.9% | 384.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -14.6% | 21.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -76.5% | 1769.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $14.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $52.7M | $69.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.0M | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.9M | $101.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.1M | $53.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $52.2M | $57.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.0M | $55.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.2M | $36.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $58.0M | $29.5M |
| Q4 25 | $484.0K | $268.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1M | $27.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.9M | $59.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-154.0K | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $117.9M | $12.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.5M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $-8.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 91.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 93.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 95.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 91.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 89.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 85.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 92.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 93.1% |
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | 33.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 40.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.3% | 60.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.0% | 23.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 25.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | -23.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 384.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 40.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.8% | 58.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | 21.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 368.2% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.3% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | -27.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $14.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.14 | $1.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.50 | $3.28 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.63 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | $0.82 | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.93 | $0.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.32 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.08 | $-0.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $37.5M | $155.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $52.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $358.5M | $391.5M |
| Total Assets | $595.9M | $513.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $37.5M | $155.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.7M | $137.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.5M | $108.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.7M | $77.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.6M | $77.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $86.5M | $61.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7M | $49.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | $49.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $52.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $60.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.0M | $60.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.2M | $60.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.2M | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $374.1M | $60.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $369.6M | $60.0M |
| Q4 25 | $358.5M | $391.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $389.6M | $117.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $383.3M | $81.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $385.2M | $18.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $375.0M | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $379.7M | $-14.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $249.7M | $-29.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $249.3M | $-31.7M |
| Q4 25 | $595.9M | $513.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $638.4M | $242.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $623.3M | $206.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $646.4M | $176.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $726.2M | $164.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $730.7M | $139.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $861.7M | $128.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $625.8M | $126.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | 0.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 0.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | 3.23× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.07× | 18.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.50× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.48× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $14.1M | $22.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $13.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 26.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 29.18× | 0.08× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $14.1M | $22.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.0M | $24.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4M | $30.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-27.1M | $-893.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.5M | $14.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1M | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1M | $302.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.7M | $-5.0M |
| Q4 25 | $13.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-27.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 26.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -43.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 29.18× | 0.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.52× | 0.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.57× | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.08× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.59× | 1.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.13× | 1.75× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.72× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IIIV
| License And Service | $35.7M | 68% |
| Proprietary Payments Revenue | $14.5M | 27% |
| Other Revenue | $2.5M | 5% |
RIGL
Segment breakdown not available.
