vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT) and SITIME Corp (SITM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Industrial Logistics Properties Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($113.9M vs $113.6M, roughly 1.0× SITIME Corp). On growth, SITIME Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (88.3% vs 3.1%). Over the past eight quarters, SITIME Corp's revenue compounded faster (60.9% CAGR vs 0.7%).
Industrial Logistics Properties Trust is a real estate investment trust that owns and operates a portfolio of industrial and logistics real estate assets primarily across the United States. Its holdings include distribution centers, warehouses, and last-mile delivery properties, serving e-commerce, retail, manufacturing and supply chain operators to meet their storage and logistics operation needs.
SiTime Corporation is a publicly traded fabless chipmaker based in Santa Clara, California that develops micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS), used for timing devices in electronics.
ILPT vs SITM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $113.9M | $113.6M |
| Net Profit | $-1.8M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 59.0% |
| Operating Margin | -22.1% | 30.2% |
| Net Margin | -1.6% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 3.1% | 88.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 92.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $-0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $113.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $113.9M | $113.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $110.9M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $112.1M | $69.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.9M | $60.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $110.5M | $68.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $108.9M | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $110.6M | $43.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-21.6M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-21.3M | $-20.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.5M | $-23.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.1M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.0M | $-19.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-23.2M | $-26.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 59.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 56.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 53.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 51.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 52.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 51.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -22.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -29.4% | -19.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.8% | -35.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -26.9% | -46.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -31.1% | -33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -33.5% | -43.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -32.4% | -73.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.6% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.4% | -9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -19.0% | -29.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -19.2% | -39.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.8% | -27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.9% | -33.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.9% | -61.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.02 | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.33 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.32 | $-0.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.33 | $-1.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.37 | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.38 | $-0.83 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.35 | $-1.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $94.8M | $498.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $489.7M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $5.2B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 8.56× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $498.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $94.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $108.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $131.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $489.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $494.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $519.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $539.5M | $692.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $562.0M | $699.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $585.9M | $696.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $618.3M | $692.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | $872.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | $885.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5B | $877.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5B | $878.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.49× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.09× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.96× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.65× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.96× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $60.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $42.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 36.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 16.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $79.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $60.7M | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.7M | $31.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | $15.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $15.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0M | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.4M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.8M | $-181.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $42.0M | $13.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.6M | $26.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.7M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.9M | $-6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.4M | $-2.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 36.9% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.5% | -4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.5% | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.5% | -11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | -6.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.4% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 26.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | 27.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | 23.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
