vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of INGLES MARKETS INC (IMKTA) and RUSH ENTERPRISES INC \TX\ (RUSHA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

RUSH ENTERPRISES INC \TX\ is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.2× INGLES MARKETS INC). RUSH ENTERPRISES INC \TX\ runs the higher net margin — 3.7% vs 2.0%, a 1.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INGLES MARKETS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs -9.0%). RUSH ENTERPRISES INC \TX\ produced more free cash flow last quarter ($411.6M vs $2.1M). Over the past eight quarters, INGLES MARKETS INC's revenue compounded faster (0.2% CAGR vs -6.8%).

Ingles Markets, Inc. is an American supermarket chain based in Black Mountain, North Carolina. As of September 2021, the company operates 198 supermarkets in the Appalachian region of the Southeastern United States. The company is listed on the NASDAQ under the ticker symbol IMKTA and is part of the Global Select Market tier of trading.

Rush Enterprises is an American commercial vehicle dealership headquartered in New Braunfels, Texas. It primarily sells new and used trucks, through its Rush Truck Centers. In 2019, the company operated over 200 Rush Truck Centers in 20 U.S. states as well as 14 locations in Canada. As of 2020, it was a Fortune 500 corporation.

IMKTA vs RUSHA — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
RUSHA
RUSHA
1.2× larger
RUSHA
$1.7B
$1.4B
IMKTA
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
IMKTA
IMKTA
+15.6% gap
IMKTA
6.6%
-9.0%
RUSHA
Higher net margin
RUSHA
RUSHA
1.6% more per $
RUSHA
3.7%
2.0%
IMKTA
More free cash flow
RUSHA
RUSHA
$409.5M more FCF
RUSHA
$411.6M
$2.1M
IMKTA
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
IMKTA
IMKTA
Annualised
IMKTA
0.2%
-6.8%
RUSHA

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
IMKTA
IMKTA
RUSHA
RUSHA
Revenue
$1.4B
$1.7B
Net Profit
$28.1M
$61.7M
Gross Margin
24.4%
20.4%
Operating Margin
2.9%
4.9%
Net Margin
2.0%
3.7%
Revenue YoY
6.6%
-9.0%
Net Profit YoY
69.6%
1.8%
EPS (diluted)
$0.77

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
IMKTA
IMKTA
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
$1.7B
Q4 25
$1.4B
$1.7B
Q3 25
$1.4B
$1.8B
Q2 25
$1.3B
$1.8B
Q1 25
$1.3B
$1.8B
Q4 24
$1.3B
$1.9B
Q3 24
$1.4B
$1.8B
Q2 24
$1.4B
$1.9B
Net Profit
IMKTA
IMKTA
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
$61.7M
Q4 25
$28.1M
$64.3M
Q3 25
$25.7M
$66.7M
Q2 25
$26.2M
$72.4M
Q1 25
$15.1M
$60.3M
Q4 24
$16.6M
$74.8M
Q3 24
$-1.5M
$79.1M
Q2 24
$31.7M
$78.7M
Gross Margin
IMKTA
IMKTA
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
20.4%
Q4 25
24.4%
20.8%
Q3 25
24.5%
21.0%
Q2 25
24.3%
20.7%
Q1 25
23.4%
20.3%
Q4 24
23.4%
19.3%
Q3 24
21.4%
21.0%
Q2 24
23.7%
20.2%
Operating Margin
IMKTA
IMKTA
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
4.9%
Q4 25
2.9%
5.5%
Q3 25
2.6%
5.6%
Q2 25
2.8%
6.0%
Q1 25
1.6%
5.2%
Q4 24
1.8%
5.8%
Q3 24
-0.1%
6.7%
Q2 24
3.2%
6.4%
Net Margin
IMKTA
IMKTA
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
3.7%
Q4 25
2.0%
3.8%
Q3 25
1.9%
3.7%
Q2 25
1.9%
3.9%
Q1 25
1.1%
3.4%
Q4 24
1.3%
3.9%
Q3 24
-0.1%
4.4%
Q2 24
2.3%
4.1%
EPS (diluted)
IMKTA
IMKTA
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
$0.77
Q4 25
$0.81
Q3 25
$0.83
Q2 25
$0.90
Q1 25
$0.73
Q4 24
$-95.13
Q3 24
$0.97
Q2 24
$97.00

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
IMKTA
IMKTA
RUSHA
RUSHA
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
Total DebtLower is stronger
$277.8M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.6B
$2.3B
Total Assets
$2.6B
$4.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.12×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
IMKTA
IMKTA
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
Q4 25
$212.6M
Q3 25
$242.0M
Q2 25
$211.1M
Q1 25
$228.7M
Q4 24
$228.1M
Q3 24
$185.1M
Q2 24
$167.3M
Total Debt
IMKTA
IMKTA
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
$277.8M
Q4 25
$274.8M
Q3 25
$514.8M
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$408.4M
Q3 24
$532.6M
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
IMKTA
IMKTA
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
$2.3B
Q4 25
$1.6B
$2.2B
Q3 25
$1.6B
$2.2B
Q2 25
$1.6B
$2.2B
Q1 25
$1.6B
$2.2B
Q4 24
$1.6B
$2.1B
Q3 24
$1.5B
$2.1B
Q2 24
$1.6B
$2.0B
Total Assets
IMKTA
IMKTA
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
$4.5B
Q4 25
$2.6B
$4.4B
Q3 25
$2.6B
$4.6B
Q2 25
$2.5B
$4.7B
Q1 25
$2.5B
$4.7B
Q4 24
$2.5B
$4.6B
Q3 24
$2.5B
$4.6B
Q2 24
$2.5B
$4.5B
Debt / Equity
IMKTA
IMKTA
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
0.12×
Q4 25
0.12×
Q3 25
0.32×
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.19×
Q3 24
0.34×
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
IMKTA
IMKTA
RUSHA
RUSHA
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$38.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$2.1M
$411.6M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
0.1%
24.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.6%
2.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.37×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$123.1M
$828.4M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
IMKTA
IMKTA
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
Q4 25
$38.4M
$112.9M
Q3 25
$59.9M
$367.8M
Q2 25
$74.8M
$227.6M
Q1 25
$63.1M
$153.5M
Q4 24
$-43.6M
$392.3M
Q3 24
$73.3M
$111.7M
Q2 24
$103.3M
$270.6M
Free Cash Flow
IMKTA
IMKTA
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
$411.6M
Q4 25
$2.1M
$31.9M
Q3 25
$36.8M
$271.2M
Q2 25
$45.4M
$113.8M
Q1 25
$38.9M
$45.1M
Q4 24
$-81.4M
$263.5M
Q3 24
$5.4M
$-20.0M
Q2 24
$58.6M
$177.2M
FCF Margin
IMKTA
IMKTA
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
24.4%
Q4 25
0.1%
1.9%
Q3 25
2.7%
15.2%
Q2 25
3.4%
6.2%
Q1 25
2.9%
2.6%
Q4 24
-6.3%
13.7%
Q3 24
0.4%
-1.1%
Q2 24
4.2%
9.1%
Capex Intensity
IMKTA
IMKTA
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
2.0%
Q4 25
2.6%
4.8%
Q3 25
1.7%
5.4%
Q2 25
2.2%
6.2%
Q1 25
1.8%
6.2%
Q4 24
2.9%
6.7%
Q3 24
4.9%
7.3%
Q2 24
3.2%
4.8%
Cash Conversion
IMKTA
IMKTA
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.37×
1.75×
Q3 25
2.33×
5.51×
Q2 25
2.85×
3.14×
Q1 25
4.17×
2.55×
Q4 24
-2.63×
5.25×
Q3 24
1.41×
Q2 24
3.26×
3.44×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

IMKTA
IMKTA

Grocery$502.1M37%
Perishables$359.7M26%
Non Foods$305.5M22%
Gasoline$152.1M11%
Other$53.6M4%

RUSHA
RUSHA

New and used commercial vehicle sales$955.1M57%
Aftermarket products and services sales$627.2M37%
Lease and rental sales$92.3M5%
Finance and insurance$5.6M0%

Related Comparisons