vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IMPERIAL OIL LTD (IMO) and Performance Food Group Co (PFGC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Performance Food Group Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($16.4B vs $8.2B, roughly 2.0× IMPERIAL OIL LTD). IMPERIAL OIL LTD runs the higher net margin — 4.4% vs 0.4%, a 4.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Performance Food Group Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.2% vs -10.5%). IMPERIAL OIL LTD produced more free cash flow last quarter ($938.8M vs $487.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Performance Food Group Co's revenue compounded faster (8.9% CAGR vs -4.2%).
Imperial Oil Limited is a Canadian petroleum company. It is Canada's second-largest integrated oil company that is also occasionally known as Imperial Esso. It is majority-owned by American oil company ExxonMobil, with a 69.6% ownership stake in the company. It is a producer of crude oil, diluted bitumen, and natural gas. Imperial Oil is one of Canada's major petroleum refiners and petrochemical producers. It supplies Esso-brand service stations.
PepsiCo, Inc. is an American multinational food and beverage corporation headquartered in Harrison, New York, in the hamlet of Purchase. PepsiCo's business encompasses all aspects of the food and beverage market. It oversees the manufacturing, distribution, and marketing of its products. PepsiCo was formed in 1965 with the merger of the Pepsi-Cola Company and Frito-Lay, Inc., PepsiCo has since expanded from its namesake product Pepsi to an immensely diversified range of food and beverage bran...
IMO vs PFGC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.2B | $16.4B |
| Net Profit | $359.2M | $61.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 12.0% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 1.2% |
| Net Margin | 4.4% | 0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.5% | 5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -59.8% | 45.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $8.2B | $16.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.8B | $17.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.2B | $16.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.1B | $15.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2B | $15.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.7B | $15.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8B | $15.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.0B | $13.9B |
| Q4 25 | $359.2M | $61.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $393.5M | $93.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $692.8M | $131.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $940.2M | $58.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $894.3M | $42.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $903.0M | $108.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $827.1M | $166.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $872.4M | $70.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.3% |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.8% | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.7% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.85 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.27 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.45 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $833.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.9B | $5.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $16.2B | $4.6B |
| Total Assets | $30.9B | $18.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.18× | 1.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $833.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $714.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $858.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | $16.2B | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.2B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.8B | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.1B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.5B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.9B | $4.0B |
| Q4 25 | $30.9B | $18.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.4B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.2B | $17.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.0B | $17.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.3B | $17.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.0B | $14.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.2B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.0B | $12.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.18× | 1.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.17× | 1.23× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.16× | 1.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.16× | 1.25× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.17× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.17× | 0.93× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.17× | 0.78× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.17× | 0.81× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.4B | $601.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $938.8M | $487.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.4% | 3.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.6% | 0.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.90× | 9.74× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $3.4B | $792.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $601.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $-145.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $383.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $448.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $325.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $53.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $206.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $785.5M | $402.7M |
| Q4 25 | $938.8M | $487.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $944.6M | $-224.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $725.6M | $209.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $824.2M | $319.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $997.2M | $218.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $730.7M | $-43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $852.6M | $55.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $422.7M | $305.4M |
| Q4 25 | 11.4% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | -0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.7% | 2.2% |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.4% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 3.90× | 9.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.34× | -1.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.54× | 2.91× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.19× | 7.69× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.46× | 7.68× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.20× | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.44× | 1.24× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.90× | 5.72× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IMO
Segment breakdown not available.
PFGC
| Foodservice | $8.8B | 54% |
| Convenience | $6.3B | 38% |
| Specialty | $1.3B | 8% |
