vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of IMPERIAL OIL LTD (IMO) and Qualcomm (QCOM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Qualcomm is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($12.3B vs $8.2B, roughly 1.5× IMPERIAL OIL LTD). Qualcomm runs the higher net margin — 24.5% vs 4.4%, a 20.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Qualcomm posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.0% vs -10.5%). Qualcomm produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.4B vs $938.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Qualcomm's revenue compounded faster (14.2% CAGR vs -4.2%).

Imperial Oil Limited is a Canadian petroleum company. It is Canada's second-largest integrated oil company that is also occasionally known as Imperial Esso. It is majority-owned by American oil company ExxonMobil, with a 69.6% ownership stake in the company. It is a producer of crude oil, diluted bitumen, and natural gas. Imperial Oil is one of Canada's major petroleum refiners and petrochemical producers. It supplies Esso-brand service stations.

Qualcomm Incorporated is an American multinational corporation headquartered in San Diego, California, and incorporated in Delaware. It creates semiconductors, software and services related to wireless technology. It owns patents critical to the 5G, 4G, CDMA2000, TD-SCDMA and WCDMA mobile communications standards.

IMO vs QCOM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
QCOM
QCOM
1.5× larger
QCOM
$12.3B
$8.2B
IMO
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
QCOM
QCOM
+15.5% gap
QCOM
5.0%
-10.5%
IMO
Higher net margin
QCOM
QCOM
20.2% more per $
QCOM
24.5%
4.4%
IMO
More free cash flow
QCOM
QCOM
$3.5B more FCF
QCOM
$4.4B
$938.8M
IMO
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
QCOM
QCOM
Annualised
QCOM
14.2%
-4.2%
IMO

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
IMO
IMO
QCOM
QCOM
Revenue
$8.2B
$12.3B
Net Profit
$359.2M
$3.0B
Gross Margin
54.6%
Operating Margin
5.6%
27.5%
Net Margin
4.4%
24.5%
Revenue YoY
-10.5%
5.0%
Net Profit YoY
-59.8%
-5.5%
EPS (diluted)
$2.78

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
IMO
IMO
QCOM
QCOM
Q4 25
$8.2B
$12.3B
Q3 25
$8.8B
$11.3B
Q2 25
$8.2B
$10.4B
Q1 25
$9.1B
$11.0B
Q4 24
$9.2B
$11.7B
Q3 24
$9.7B
$10.2B
Q2 24
$9.8B
$9.4B
Q1 24
$9.0B
$9.4B
Net Profit
IMO
IMO
QCOM
QCOM
Q4 25
$359.2M
$3.0B
Q3 25
$393.5M
$-3.1B
Q2 25
$692.8M
$2.7B
Q1 25
$940.2M
$2.8B
Q4 24
$894.3M
$3.2B
Q3 24
$903.0M
$2.9B
Q2 24
$827.1M
$2.1B
Q1 24
$872.4M
$2.3B
Gross Margin
IMO
IMO
QCOM
QCOM
Q4 25
54.6%
Q3 25
55.3%
Q2 25
55.6%
Q1 25
55.0%
Q4 24
55.8%
Q3 24
56.4%
Q2 24
55.6%
Q1 24
56.3%
Operating Margin
IMO
IMO
QCOM
QCOM
Q4 25
5.6%
27.5%
Q3 25
5.8%
25.9%
Q2 25
11.1%
26.6%
Q1 25
13.5%
28.4%
Q4 24
12.5%
30.5%
Q3 24
12.1%
25.2%
Q2 24
11.1%
23.6%
Q1 24
12.8%
24.9%
Net Margin
IMO
IMO
QCOM
QCOM
Q4 25
4.4%
24.5%
Q3 25
4.5%
-27.7%
Q2 25
8.4%
25.7%
Q1 25
10.3%
25.6%
Q4 24
9.7%
27.3%
Q3 24
9.3%
28.5%
Q2 24
8.5%
22.7%
Q1 24
9.7%
24.8%
EPS (diluted)
IMO
IMO
QCOM
QCOM
Q4 25
$2.78
Q3 25
$-2.77
Q2 25
$2.43
Q1 25
$2.52
Q4 24
$2.83
Q3 24
$2.57
Q2 24
$1.88
Q1 24
$2.06

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
IMO
IMO
QCOM
QCOM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$833.7M
$11.8B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.9B
$14.8B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$16.2B
$23.1B
Total Assets
$30.9B
$53.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.18×
0.64×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
IMO
IMO
QCOM
QCOM
Q4 25
$833.7M
$11.8B
Q3 25
$1.4B
$10.2B
Q2 25
$1.7B
$10.0B
Q1 25
$1.3B
$13.8B
Q4 24
$714.7M
$14.3B
Q3 24
$1.1B
$13.3B
Q2 24
$1.5B
$13.0B
Q1 24
$858.5M
$13.9B
Total Debt
IMO
IMO
QCOM
QCOM
Q4 25
$2.9B
$14.8B
Q3 25
$2.9B
$14.8B
Q2 25
$2.9B
$14.8B
Q1 25
$2.9B
$13.3B
Q4 24
$2.9B
$13.2B
Q3 24
$2.9B
$13.3B
Q2 24
$2.9B
$13.2B
Q1 24
$2.9B
$14.5B
Stockholders' Equity
IMO
IMO
QCOM
QCOM
Q4 25
$16.2B
$23.1B
Q3 25
$17.3B
$21.2B
Q2 25
$18.2B
$27.2B
Q1 25
$17.8B
$27.7B
Q4 24
$17.1B
$26.9B
Q3 24
$17.3B
$26.3B
Q2 24
$17.5B
$24.7B
Q1 24
$16.9B
$24.5B
Total Assets
IMO
IMO
QCOM
QCOM
Q4 25
$30.9B
$53.0B
Q3 25
$31.4B
$50.1B
Q2 25
$32.2B
$54.9B
Q1 25
$32.0B
$55.4B
Q4 24
$31.3B
$55.6B
Q3 24
$31.0B
$55.2B
Q2 24
$32.2B
$52.7B
Q1 24
$31.0B
$53.2B
Debt / Equity
IMO
IMO
QCOM
QCOM
Q4 25
0.18×
0.64×
Q3 25
0.17×
0.70×
Q2 25
0.16×
0.54×
Q1 25
0.16×
0.48×
Q4 24
0.17×
0.49×
Q3 24
0.17×
0.51×
Q2 24
0.17×
0.53×
Q1 24
0.17×
0.59×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
IMO
IMO
QCOM
QCOM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$1.4B
$5.0B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$938.8M
$4.4B
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
11.4%
36.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
5.6%
4.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
3.90×
1.65×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$3.4B
$12.9B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
IMO
IMO
QCOM
QCOM
Q4 25
$1.4B
$5.0B
Q3 25
$1.3B
$4.0B
Q2 25
$1.1B
$2.9B
Q1 25
$1.1B
$2.6B
Q4 24
$1.3B
$4.6B
Q3 24
$1.1B
$2.6B
Q2 24
$1.2B
$3.1B
Q1 24
$785.5M
$3.6B
Free Cash Flow
IMO
IMO
QCOM
QCOM
Q4 25
$938.8M
$4.4B
Q3 25
$944.6M
$3.6B
Q2 25
$725.6M
$2.6B
Q1 25
$824.2M
$2.3B
Q4 24
$997.2M
$4.3B
Q3 24
$730.7M
$2.4B
Q2 24
$852.6M
$2.7B
Q1 24
$422.7M
$3.4B
FCF Margin
IMO
IMO
QCOM
QCOM
Q4 25
11.4%
36.0%
Q3 25
10.7%
31.8%
Q2 25
8.8%
24.9%
Q1 25
9.0%
21.3%
Q4 24
10.8%
36.9%
Q3 24
7.5%
23.3%
Q2 24
8.7%
28.4%
Q1 24
4.7%
35.9%
Capex Intensity
IMO
IMO
QCOM
QCOM
Q4 25
5.6%
4.5%
Q3 25
4.2%
3.6%
Q2 25
4.2%
2.8%
Q1 25
3.2%
1.9%
Q4 24
3.4%
2.4%
Q3 24
3.7%
2.5%
Q2 24
3.4%
4.1%
Q1 24
4.0%
2.0%
Cash Conversion
IMO
IMO
QCOM
QCOM
Q4 25
3.90×
1.65×
Q3 25
3.34×
Q2 25
1.54×
1.08×
Q1 25
1.19×
0.91×
Q4 24
1.46×
1.44×
Q3 24
1.20×
0.91×
Q2 24
1.44×
1.43×
Q1 24
0.90×
1.53×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

IMO
IMO

Segment breakdown not available.

QCOM
QCOM

Handsets$7.8B64%
Io T$1.7B14%
Qtl$1.6B13%
Automotive$1.1B9%

Related Comparisons