vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ingram Micro Holding Corp (INGM) and Paramount Skydance Corporation (PSKY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ingram Micro Holding Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.0B vs $7.3B, roughly 1.9× Paramount Skydance Corporation). Paramount Skydance Corporation runs the higher net margin — 2.1% vs 0.7%, a 1.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ingram Micro Holding Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.7% vs 2.2%). Paramount Skydance Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($123.0M vs $-962.3M).
Ingram Micro Holding Corporation is an American distributor of information technology products and services. The company is based in Irvine, California, U.S. and has operations around the world. Founded as Micro D, Inc in 1979 in California by Geza Czige and Lorraine Mecca, the company, originally a traditional distributor focused on marketing, selling and shipping vendor products to resellers, is currently specializing on becoming a platform-based business that focuses on its digital experie...
Paramount Skydance Corporation is an American multinational mass media and entertainment conglomerate. The company is headquartered at the Paramount Pictures lot in the Hollywood neighborhood of Los Angeles, California, with multiple of Paramount's divisions and subsidiaries, as well as one of Paramount's major offices and meeting places, being headquartered at the previous Paramount Global headquarters at One Astor Plaza in New York City.
INGM vs PSKY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.0B | $7.3B |
| Net Profit | $98.9M | $152.0M |
| Gross Margin | 6.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.6% | 8.4% |
| Net Margin | 0.7% | 2.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.7% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 42.9% | 10.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.68 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $14.0B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.6B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.8B | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.3B | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8B | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | $98.9M | $152.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $121.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.5M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.8M | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.2M | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.0M | $1.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.6M | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | $49.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.6% | 8.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | -0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.68 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.52 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.42 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.16 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.35 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.22 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $916.0M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.3B | $14.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.2B | $12.7B |
| Total Assets | $20.9B | $44.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.79× | 1.16× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $916.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $802.6M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $856.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $881.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $849.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.3B | $14.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $4.2B | $12.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $12.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $17.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | $20.9B | $44.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.2B | $43.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.5B | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.6B | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.79× | 1.16× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.93× | 1.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.92× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.90× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-962.3M | $123.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.9% | 1.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $53.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-146.0M | $268.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-298.0M | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-200.4M | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-277.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-100.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | $-962.3M | $123.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-175.0M | $222.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-333.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-230.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-315.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-135.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | -6.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.4% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.85× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.47× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.88× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.90× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.02× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
INGM
Segment breakdown not available.
PSKY
| TV Media | $3.9B | 53% |
| Direct-to-Consumer | $2.2B | 29% |
| Studios | $1.2B | 16% |
| Other | $153.0M | 2% |
