vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INNO HOLDINGS INC. (INHD) and Lucid Diagnostics Inc. (LUCD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INNO HOLDINGS INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5M vs $1.2M, roughly 1.2× Lucid Diagnostics Inc.). INNO HOLDINGS INC. runs the higher net margin — -2.0% vs -858.5%, a 856.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INNO HOLDINGS INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (635.6% vs 3.3%).
INNOvative Retail BV, is an upmarket Belgian department store chain that operates sixteen branches around Belgium.
Lucid Diagnostics Inc. is a commercial-stage medical diagnostics firm focused on non-invasive screening tests for upper gastrointestinal diseases, including early detection of esophageal cancer and pre-cancerous lesions. It mainly serves healthcare providers and clinical partners across the United States, targeting at-risk patient populations.
INHD vs LUCD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5M | $1.2M |
| Net Profit | $-28.6K | $-10.4M |
| Gross Margin | 5.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -33.4% | -971.0% |
| Net Margin | -2.0% | -858.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 635.6% | 3.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 95.3% | 16.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1M | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $478.1K | $828.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $196.0K | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $490.0K | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $976.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $183.2K | $1.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-28.6K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.3M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.6M | $-26.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-603.7K | $-11.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-287.2K | $-12.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-11.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $-10.6M |
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -33.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -89.7% | -971.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -143.7% | -978.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -286.4% | -1508.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -233.7% | -1033.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 87.7% | -997.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1146.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -150.9% | -1078.1% |
| Q4 25 | -2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -120.5% | -858.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -142.4% | -381.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -757.3% | -3249.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -308.0% | -964.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -58.6% | -1055.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1127.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -578.9% | -1060.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.03 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.30 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.83 | $-0.52 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.21 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.23 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.51 | $-0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $37.1M | $47.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $47.2M | $25.8M |
| Total Assets | $47.3M | $53.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $37.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | $47.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | $31.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9M | $25.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0M | $24.8M |
| Q4 25 | $47.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.2M | $25.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.0M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.1M | $11.9M |
| Q4 25 | $47.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.0M | $53.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8M | $38.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.7M | $30.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2M | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $34.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $32.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-5.0M | $-10.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-5.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.0M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-594.8K | $-10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.0M | $-12.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.1M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-660.2K | $-10.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-11.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.9M | $-12.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-795.1K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1083.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -162.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1720.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 118.1% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.