vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INNO HOLDINGS INC. (INHD) and RICHTECH ROBOTICS INC. (RR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INNO HOLDINGS INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5M vs $1.1M, roughly 1.3× RICHTECH ROBOTICS INC.). INNO HOLDINGS INC. runs the higher net margin — -2.0% vs -732.5%, a 730.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INNO HOLDINGS INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (635.6% vs -8.8%).
INNOvative Retail BV, is an upmarket Belgian department store chain that operates sixteen branches around Belgium.
Richtech Robotics Inc. develops, manufactures and sells AI-powered commercial service robots, including food delivery, intelligent cleaning and hospitality automation solutions. It serves catering, retail, hotel and healthcare clients across North America, Asia Pacific and European markets.
INHD vs RR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5M | $1.1M |
| Net Profit | $-28.6K | $-8.4M |
| Gross Margin | 5.1% | 52.3% |
| Operating Margin | -33.4% | -1029.6% |
| Net Margin | -2.0% | -732.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 635.6% | -8.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 95.3% | -136.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $-0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $478.1K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $196.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $490.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $183.2K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-28.6K | $-8.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-603.7K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-287.2K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | 52.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -33.4% | -1029.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -89.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -143.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -286.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -233.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 87.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -150.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -2.0% | -732.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -120.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -142.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -757.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -308.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -58.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -578.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.03 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.30 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.83 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.21 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.51 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $37.1M | $328.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $47.2M | $339.7M |
| Total Assets | $47.3M | $349.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $37.1M | $328.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $47.2M | $339.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $47.3M | $349.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-5.0M | $-1.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-1.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -146.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 6.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-5.0M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-594.8K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-660.2K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-795.1K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -146.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1083.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -162.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1720.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 118.1% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
