vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INFINITY NATURAL RESOURCES, INC. (INR) and National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
National Storage Affiliates Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($187.0M vs $115.5M, roughly 1.6× INFINITY NATURAL RESOURCES, INC.). INFINITY NATURAL RESOURCES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 17.3% vs 12.2%, a 5.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
National Storage Affiliates Trust is a U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust focused on self-storage assets. It owns, operates and acquires self-storage facilities across dozens of U.S. states, offering secure storage solutions for residential and commercial customers.
INR vs NSA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $115.5M | $187.0M |
| Net Profit | $20.0M | $22.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 72.5% |
| Operating Margin | 47.0% | 20.2% |
| Net Margin | 17.3% | 12.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -1.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 36.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.33 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $115.5M | $187.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.3M | $188.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.5M | $188.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.2M | $188.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $190.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $193.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $190.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $196.1M |
| Q4 25 | $20.0M | $22.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.4M | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.0M | $19.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-34.6M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $18.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $59.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 72.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 70.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 70.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 70.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 72.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 72.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 72.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 72.1% |
| Q4 25 | 47.0% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.5% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.9% | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -104.5% | 11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 48.9% |
| Q4 25 | 17.3% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.3% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.8% | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -41.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 30.1% |
| Q4 25 | $1.33 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.65 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.18 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.27 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.8M | $23.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $55.0K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $307.1M | $946.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.8M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6M | $26.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $26.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $19.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $50.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $59.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $64.2M |
| Q4 25 | $55.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $123.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $307.1M | $946.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $288.6M | $973.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-52.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $986.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $953.9M | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $75.1M | $338.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $299.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 160.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 20.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.75× | 14.79× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $541.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $75.1M | $338.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.1M | $100.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.4M | $79.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.2M | $85.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $363.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $105.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $83.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $94.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $299.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $88.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $79.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $344.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $101.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $79.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $88.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 160.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 46.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 42.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 181.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 52.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 45.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | 3.75× | 14.79× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.04× | 5.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.91× | 4.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.65× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.88× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.59× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
INR
| Oil Reserves | $54.0M | 47% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $46.8M | 41% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $14.7M | 13% |
NSA
Segment breakdown not available.