vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INSEEGO CORP. (INSG) and MetroCity Bankshares, Inc. (MCBS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INSEEGO CORP. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($48.4M vs $43.7M, roughly 1.1× MetroCity Bankshares, Inc.). MetroCity Bankshares, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 50.5% vs 1.0%, a 49.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MetroCity Bankshares, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.6% vs 0.6%). MetroCity Bankshares, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($37.0M vs $11.6M). Over the past eight quarters, MetroCity Bankshares, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (15.7% CAGR vs 13.6%).
Inseego Corp designs, manufactures and delivers advanced 5G and IoT solutions including mobile hotspots, edge computing devices, and cloud-based device management platforms. It primarily serves telecom operators, enterprise clients, and public sector customers across global markets.
Metro City Bank is a Korean-American bank based in Doraville, Georgia and offers personal and commercial banking services. It is the largest Korean-American bank to not be based out of Los Angeles, California. It currently operates a total of 19 branches in Texas, New York, New Jersey, Virginia, Georgia, Alabama, and Florida.
INSG vs MCBS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $48.4M | $43.7M |
| Net Profit | $469.0K | $18.1M |
| Gross Margin | 42.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.7% | 52.8% |
| Net Margin | 1.0% | 50.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.6% | 23.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 182.9% | 11.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $0.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $48.4M | $43.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.9M | $38.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.2M | $37.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.7M | $36.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.1M | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.0M | $36.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.6M | $36.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.5M | $32.7M |
| Q4 25 | $469.0K | $18.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $507.0K | $16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | $16.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-566.0K | $16.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0M | $16.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $624.0K | $16.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.5M | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | 42.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 52.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 62.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 62.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | 61.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 58.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 61.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 64.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.9% | 62.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | 50.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 44.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.0% | 45.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.2% | 54.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.6% | 45.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 46.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.9% | 44.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.02 | $0.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.03 | $0.67 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $0.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | $0.63 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.62 | $0.64 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $0.65 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.02 | $0.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.44 | $0.57 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $24.9M | $383.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-4.0M | $544.2M |
| Total Assets | $93.8M | $4.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $24.9M | $383.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.6M | $227.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.2M | $286.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.1M | $285.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.6M | $249.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.0M | $291.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.0M | $327.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.3M | $258.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-4.0M | $544.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.7M | $445.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.5M | $436.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.0M | $428.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-12.9M | $421.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-85.1M | $407.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-101.8M | $407.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-105.6M | $396.6M |
| Q4 25 | $93.8M | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.8M | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.1M | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $93.0M | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.0M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $113.4M | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $149.6M | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $122.1M | $3.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $12.0M | $37.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $11.6M | $37.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 24.0% | 84.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 25.50× | 2.08× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.5M | $79.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $12.0M | $37.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2M | $16.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.5M | $14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-14.2M | $63.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.6M | $19.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $36.4M |
| Q4 25 | $11.6M | $37.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.7M | $14.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | $11.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-14.3M | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8M | $-11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.6M | $19.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $36.1M |
| Q4 25 | 24.0% | 84.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.6% | 37.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.0% | 32.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.7% | 175.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.4% | -31.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.5% | 52.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 110.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 25.50× | 2.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.22× | 0.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.81× | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.91× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.65× | -0.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.31× | 1.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.49× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.