vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Intapp, Inc. (INTA) and Viridian Therapeutics, Inc.\DE (VRDN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Intapp, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($140.2M vs $70.6M, roughly 2.0× Viridian Therapeutics, Inc.\DE). Intapp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -4.2% vs -49.0%, a 44.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Viridian Therapeutics, Inc.\DE posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (81958.1% vs 15.7%). Intapp, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($22.2M vs $-84.7M).

Intapp, Inc. is a global provider of cloud-native software solutions designed exclusively for professional services firms, including legal practices, accounting firms, consulting agencies, private equity firms, and investment banks. Its offerings span client lifecycle management, risk and compliance tools, operational workflow automation, and financial performance tracking, with key markets across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific.

Viridian Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biotechnology firm developing novel disease-modifying therapies for rare, serious autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Its lead pipeline candidate targets thyroid eye disease, a debilitating orbital disorder, with primary market focus on North America and Europe.

INTA vs VRDN — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
INTA
INTA
2.0× larger
INTA
$140.2M
$70.6M
VRDN
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
VRDN
VRDN
+81942.5% gap
VRDN
81958.1%
15.7%
INTA
Higher net margin
INTA
INTA
44.8% more per $
INTA
-4.2%
-49.0%
VRDN
More free cash flow
INTA
INTA
$107.0M more FCF
INTA
$22.2M
$-84.7M
VRDN

Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025

Metric
INTA
INTA
VRDN
VRDN
Revenue
$140.2M
$70.6M
Net Profit
$-5.9M
$-34.6M
Gross Margin
75.0%
Operating Margin
-5.1%
-56.7%
Net Margin
-4.2%
-49.0%
Revenue YoY
15.7%
81958.1%
Net Profit YoY
41.9%
54.9%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.07

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
INTA
INTA
VRDN
VRDN
Q4 25
$140.2M
Q3 25
$139.0M
$70.6M
Net Profit
INTA
INTA
VRDN
VRDN
Q4 25
$-5.9M
Q3 25
$-14.4M
$-34.6M
Gross Margin
INTA
INTA
VRDN
VRDN
Q4 25
75.0%
Q3 25
74.7%
Operating Margin
INTA
INTA
VRDN
VRDN
Q4 25
-5.1%
Q3 25
-10.4%
-56.7%
Net Margin
INTA
INTA
VRDN
VRDN
Q4 25
-4.2%
Q3 25
-10.3%
-49.0%
EPS (diluted)
INTA
INTA
VRDN
VRDN
Q4 25
$-0.07
Q3 25
$-0.18

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
INTA
INTA
VRDN
VRDN
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$191.2M
$490.9M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$410.2M
$503.0M
Total Assets
$795.2M
$577.1M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
INTA
INTA
VRDN
VRDN
Q4 25
$191.2M
Q3 25
$273.4M
$490.9M
Stockholders' Equity
INTA
INTA
VRDN
VRDN
Q4 25
$410.2M
Q3 25
$486.4M
$503.0M
Total Assets
INTA
INTA
VRDN
VRDN
Q4 25
$795.2M
Q3 25
$823.3M
$577.1M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
INTA
INTA
VRDN
VRDN
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$22.9M
$-84.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$22.2M
$-84.7M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
15.8%
-120.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.5%
0.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
INTA
INTA
VRDN
VRDN
Q4 25
$22.9M
Q3 25
$13.8M
$-84.6M
Free Cash Flow
INTA
INTA
VRDN
VRDN
Q4 25
$22.2M
Q3 25
$13.2M
$-84.7M
FCF Margin
INTA
INTA
VRDN
VRDN
Q4 25
15.8%
Q3 25
9.5%
-120.1%
Capex Intensity
INTA
INTA
VRDN
VRDN
Q4 25
0.5%
Q3 25
0.4%
0.2%

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

INTA
INTA

Saa S$102.5M73%
License$25.4M18%
Professional Services$12.3M9%

VRDN
VRDN

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons