vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INTEST CORP (INTT) and MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP (MBCN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INTEST CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($32.8M vs $19.9M, roughly 1.7× MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP). MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP runs the higher net margin — 26.7% vs 3.8%, a 23.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.3% vs -10.3%). MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.4M vs $-1.6M). Over the past eight quarters, MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP's revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs 4.9%).
INTTEST Corp designs, manufactures and distributes precision test and process control solutions for the global semiconductor manufacturing ecosystem. Its offerings include thermal management systems, test interface hardware, and wafer handling tools, serving semiconductor fabs, chip design firms, and automotive and industrial electronics end segments.
Star Banc Corporation was a Cincinnati, Ohio-based regional bank holding company that acquired Firstar in 1998 and took the Firstar name; the merged bank acquired U.S. Bancorp in 2001 and took the U.S. Bancorp name. The company can trace its origins back to 1863 when it was first founded as the First National Bank of Cincinnati.
INTT vs MBCN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.8M | $19.9M |
| Net Profit | $1.2M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | 45.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 3.9% | 32.2% |
| Net Margin | 3.8% | 26.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.3% | 18.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -17.4% | 127.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.10 | $0.65 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $32.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.2M | $19.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.1M | $20.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.6M | $18.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.6M | $17.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.3M | $16.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.0M | $16.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.8M | $16.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-938.0K | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-503.0K | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.3M | $4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5M | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $495.0K | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0K | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $662.0K | $4.2M |
| Q4 25 | 45.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.5% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | 35.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.8% | 31.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | 33.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | 28.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 29.4% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.6% | 26.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.8% | 30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.7% | 26.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | 24.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | $0.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $0.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.13 | $0.60 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.04 | $0.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.02 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.05 | $0.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $14.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $103.6M | $224.1M |
| Total Assets | $151.3M | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $14.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $103.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.9M | $224.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.6M | $216.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.4M | $213.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $99.8M | $210.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $100.4M | $210.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.5M | $206.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $99.3M | $205.6M |
| Q4 25 | $151.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $148.3M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $149.7M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.3M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.4M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.6M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $159.5M | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.11× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.0M | $4.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.6M | $3.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -4.7% | 17.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | 7.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.82× | 0.91× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $5.7M | $32.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5M | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-688.0K | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6M | $17.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2M | $6.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.1M | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $5.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1M | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $7.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4M | $16.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7M | $5.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | -4.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.8% | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.1% | 20.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 42.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | 95.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | 34.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -15.9% | 19.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | 31.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | -0.82× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.78× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.72× | 3.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.58× | 2.57× | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.13× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.13× | 1.31× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
INTT
| Environmental Technologies | $8.3M | 25% |
| Semiconductor Market | $6.9M | 21% |
| Thermal Testing Products | $6.4M | 19% |
| Service And Other Products | $4.8M | 15% |
| Oem Integrators And Distributor | $3.5M | 11% |
| Semiconductor Production Test Products | $3.0M | 9% |
MBCN
Segment breakdown not available.
