vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INTRUSION INC (INTZ) and TMC the metals Co Inc. (TMC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INTRUSION INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5M vs $1.3M, roughly 1.1× TMC the metals Co Inc.). INTRUSION INC runs the higher net margin — -190.7% vs -3136.5%, a 2945.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TMC the metals Co Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2425.5% vs -11.6%). INTRUSION INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-549.0K vs $-11.5M). Over the past eight quarters, TMC the metals Co Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (159.0% CAGR vs 14.4%).
INTRUSION INCINTZEarnings & Financial Report
Intrusion Inc. is a cybersecurity company based in Plano, Texas. It provides cybersecurity solutions, including network intrusion detection and prevention systems.
The Metals Company, formerly DeepGreen Metals, is a Canadian deep sea mining exploration company. The company focuses on the mining of polymetallic nodules in the Clarion Clipperton Zone of the Pacific.
INTZ vs TMC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5M | $1.3M |
| Net Profit | $-2.8M | $-40.4M |
| Gross Margin | 74.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -192.4% | -3470.9% |
| Net Margin | -190.7% | -3136.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -11.6% | 2425.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -44.4% | -151.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.15 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5M | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | $-40.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.1M | $-184.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 74.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 76.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 75.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 74.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 77.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 76.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 80.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -192.4% | -3470.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -108.6% | -4134.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -111.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -117.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -113.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -135.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -139.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -218.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -190.7% | -3136.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -106.5% | -13780.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -109.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -118.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -116.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -136.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -141.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -151.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.15 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.35 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.53 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.94 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.6M | $117.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.3M | $-33.4M |
| Total Assets | $10.4M | $181.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.6M | $117.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $122.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.3M | $-33.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8M | $-40.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $10.4M | $181.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.7M | $175.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.7M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-531.0K | $-11.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-549.0K | $-11.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -37.1% | -889.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 8.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-7.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-531.0K | $-11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.0M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-178.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-549.0K | $-11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.0M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-645.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | -37.1% | -889.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -153.2% | -859.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -101.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -117.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -38.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -140.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -202.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -104.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
