vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) and VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. (VRTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($199.5M vs $114.6M, roughly 1.7× Innoviva, Inc.). Innoviva, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 143.2% vs 3.6%, a 139.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Innoviva, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.8% vs -4.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Innoviva, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (21.6% CAGR vs -5.7%).
Innoviva, Inc. is a healthcare company specializing in the development, commercialization, and royalty management of prescription therapeutics for respiratory diseases, infectious diseases, and critical care conditions. It partners with leading global pharmaceutical firms to deliver treatments for asthma, COPD and other chronic illnesses to patients across core markets including North America and Europe.
VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC.VRTSEarnings & Financial Report
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. is an American company which operates as a multi-manager asset management business, comprising a number of individual affiliated managers, each having its own investment process and brand, and the services of unaffiliated sub advisers.
INVA vs VRTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $114.6M | $199.5M |
| Net Profit | $164.2M | $7.1M |
| Gross Margin | 66.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 34.0% | 7.7% |
| Net Margin | 143.2% | 3.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 24.8% | -4.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 707.4% | -78.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.19 | $1.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $199.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $114.6M | $208.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.8M | $216.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.3M | $210.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.6M | $217.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $91.8M | $233.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $89.5M | $227.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.9M | $224.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $164.2M | $33.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.9M | $31.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.7M | $42.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.6M | $28.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.3M | $39.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-34.7M | $26.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 66.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 70.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 82.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 82.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 85.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 81.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 85.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.0% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.1% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.6% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.7% | 16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 47.0% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.3% | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.7% | 19.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 143.2% | 16.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 83.4% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 63.5% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -52.6% | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 21.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.7% | 11.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.05 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.19 | $5.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.08 | $4.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.77 | $6.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.74 | $4.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.43 | $4.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $5.71 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.55 | $2.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $550.9M | $136.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $93.6B |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $136.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $550.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $476.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $397.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $319.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $305.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $260.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $217.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $390.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $231.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $231.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $232.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $237.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $247.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $93.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $934.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $918.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $714.8M | $896.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $646.9M | $893.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $691.2M | $897.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $668.5M | $889.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $665.5M | $868.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $3.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.29× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $54.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.33× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $54.5M | $-67.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.7M | $108.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.1M | $75.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.6M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.2M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.7M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.7M | $70.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-74.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $106.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $74.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.4M | $68.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $68.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -35.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.1% | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 0.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | -1.99× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.55× | 3.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.69× | 1.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.91× | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.14× | 1.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.69× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
INVA
| Royalty | $54.9M | 48% |
| Xacduro | $32.1M | 28% |
| Giapreza | $19.6M | 17% |
| Xerava | $7.3M | 6% |
VRTS
| Investment management fees | $169.1M | 85% |
| Administration and shareholder service fees | $17.3M | 9% |
| Distribution and service fees | $11.6M | 6% |
