vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Innoviz Technologies Ltd. (INVZ) and KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.8M vs $15.3M, roughly 1.7× Innoviz Technologies Ltd.). Innoviz Technologies Ltd. runs the higher net margin — -100.9% vs -101.7%, a 0.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Luminar Technologies Inc. was an American technology company that developed vision-based lidar and machine perception technologies, primarily for self-driving cars. The company's headquarters and main research and development facilities were in Orlando, Florida; a second major office was located in Palo Alto, California.
KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. is a specialized real estate finance firm sponsored by global investment firm KKR. It primarily originates, acquires, and manages a portfolio of senior secured commercial real estate loans, mostly backed by high-quality institutional commercial properties across the United States, delivering stable risk-adjusted returns to investors via interest income from its diversified assets.
INVZ vs KREF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.3M | $25.8M |
| Net Profit | $-15.4M | $-26.2M |
| Gross Margin | 15.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -103.4% | -105.1% |
| Net Margin | -100.9% | -101.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -26.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -229.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.08 | $-0.49 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $25.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.3M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $30.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $31.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $35.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $40.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $39.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-26.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.4M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-29.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-7.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $25.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -105.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -103.4% | 50.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -101.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -19.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 63.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -101.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -100.9% | 54.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -98.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 57.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -20.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 63.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -7.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.49 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.29 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $17.3M | $84.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $89.7M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $151.1M | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $84.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3M | $204.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $107.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $106.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $104.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $108.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $107.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $106.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.1M | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-13.7M | $72.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-14.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -91.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $72.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.7M | $18.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $132.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $34.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -91.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
