vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) and MetroCity Bankshares, Inc. (MCBS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IonQ, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($61.9M vs $43.7M, roughly 1.4× MetroCity Bankshares, Inc.). IonQ, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1217.8% vs 50.5%, a 1167.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IonQ, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (428.5% vs 23.6%). MetroCity Bankshares, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($37.0M vs $-83.3M).
IonQ, Inc. is an American quantum computing hardware and software company headquartered in College Park, Maryland. The company develops general-purpose trapped ion quantum computers and accompanying software to generate, optimize, and execute quantum circuits.
Metro City Bank is a Korean-American bank based in Doraville, Georgia and offers personal and commercial banking services. It is the largest Korean-American bank to not be based out of Los Angeles, California. It currently operates a total of 19 branches in Texas, New York, New Jersey, Virginia, Georgia, Alabama, and Florida.
IONQ vs MCBS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $61.9M | $43.7M |
| Net Profit | $753.7M | $18.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -369.4% | 52.8% |
| Net Margin | 1217.8% | 50.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 428.5% | 23.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 473.1% | 11.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.60 | $0.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $61.9M | $43.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.9M | $38.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.7M | $37.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $36.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.7M | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.4M | $36.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.4M | $36.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $32.7M |
| Q4 25 | $753.7M | $18.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.1B | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-176.8M | $16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-202.0M | $16.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-52.5M | $16.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.6M | $16.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | -369.4% | 52.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -423.5% | 62.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -776.0% | 62.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 61.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -661.9% | 58.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -428.5% | 61.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -430.0% | 64.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 62.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1217.8% | 50.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2646.3% | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -854.5% | 44.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 45.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1725.0% | 54.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -423.4% | 45.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -330.0% | 46.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.8% |
| Q4 25 | $2.60 | $0.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.58 | $0.67 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.70 | $0.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.63 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.95 | $0.64 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.24 | $0.65 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.18 | $0.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.57 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.4B | $383.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.8B | $544.2M |
| Total Assets | $6.6B | $4.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $383.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $227.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $546.9M | $286.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $285.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.3M | $249.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $365.7M | $291.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $369.8M | $327.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $258.8M |
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $544.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $445.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $436.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $428.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $383.9M | $421.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $435.7M | $407.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $463.3M | $407.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $396.6M |
| Q4 25 | $6.6B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $508.4M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $497.9M | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $517.4M | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-74.5M | $37.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-83.3M | $37.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -134.6% | 84.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 14.2% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.10× | 2.08× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-307.3M | $79.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-74.5M | $37.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-123.1M | $16.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-52.6M | $14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.4M | $63.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.2M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-26.6M | $19.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $36.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-83.3M | $37.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-127.2M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-53.8M | $14.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-43.0M | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.0M | $-11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-34.1M | $19.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $36.1M |
| Q4 25 | -134.6% | 84.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -319.1% | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -259.8% | 37.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -367.4% | 175.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -185.3% | -31.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -299.3% | 52.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 110.6% |
| Q4 25 | 14.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.7% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 65.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | -0.10× | 2.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.91× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.49× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IONQ
| Other | $31.2M | 50% |
| Platform Consulting And Support Services | $30.7M | 50% |
MCBS
Segment breakdown not available.
