vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INNOSPEC INC. (IOSP) and SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP (SXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INNOSPEC INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($455.6M vs $435.8M, roughly 1.0× SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP). INNOSPEC INC. runs the higher net margin — 10.4% vs 10.1%, a 0.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.1% vs -2.4%). Over the past eight quarters, SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP's revenue compounded faster (3.9% CAGR vs -4.6%).
Innospec Inc., formerly known as Octel Corporation and Associated Octel Company, Ltd., is an American specialty chemical company. It comprises three business units:The Performance Chemicals business trades in the personal care, home care, agrochemical, mining and industrial markets. The Fuel Specialties business specializes in manufacturing and supplying fuel additives. The Oilfield Services business supplies drilling, completion and production chemicals.
Sensient Technologies is a global manufacturer and marketer of colors, flavors and fragrances based in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Their products are used in many foods and beverages, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, home and personal care products, specialty printing and imaging products, computer imaging and industrial colors. Sensient reported revenue of $1,468 million in 2013. Subdivisions include the Sensient Flavors & Fragrances Group and the Sensient Color Group. Within the Flavors & Fragrances G...
IOSP vs SXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $455.6M | $435.8M |
| Net Profit | $47.4M | $44.2M |
| Gross Margin | 28.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.3% | 15.3% |
| Net Margin | 10.4% | 10.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.4% | 11.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 167.3% | 28.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.90 | $1.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $435.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $455.6M | $393.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.9M | $412.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $439.7M | $414.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $440.8M | $392.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $466.8M | $376.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $443.4M | $392.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $435.0M | $403.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $44.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.4M | $25.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.5M | $37.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.8M | $34.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-70.4M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.4M | $32.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.2M | $30.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | 31.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.4% | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.0% | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.4% | 33.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.2% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.0% | 33.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.2% | 32.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.3% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 13.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.8% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.3% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 12.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.4% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.1% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 7.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.04 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.90 | $0.60 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.52 | $0.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.94 | $0.88 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.31 | $0.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.80 | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | $0.77 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.24 | $0.73 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $292.5M | $38.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $767.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $38.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $292.5M | $36.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $270.8M | $42.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $266.6M | $56.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $299.8M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $289.2M | $26.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $303.8M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.2M | $30.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $767.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $709.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $613.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $61.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $46.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.30× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $88.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $61.4M | $44.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.3M | $44.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.3M | $48.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.3M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.7M | $21.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.5M | $76.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7M | $43.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $46.8M | $12.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.0M | $24.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.7M | $27.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.9M | $-25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.6M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.8M | $63.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.2M | $32.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.7% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.5% | -6.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.4% | 7.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.30× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.05× | 1.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.40× | 1.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.86× | -0.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.20× | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.15× | 1.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IOSP
| Refinery And Performance | $147.0M | 32% |
| Personal Care | $99.7M | 22% |
| Oilfield Services | $93.1M | 20% |
| Other Fuel Specialties | $47.1M | 10% |
| Other Performance Chemicals | $40.0M | 9% |
| Home Care | $28.7M | 6% |
SXT
Segment breakdown not available.
