vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of INTERPARFUMS INC (IPAR) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $386.2M, roughly 1.4× INTERPARFUMS INC). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 7.3%, a 22.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INTERPARFUMS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.8% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, INTERPARFUMS INC's revenue compounded faster (9.2% CAGR vs 5.6%).

Inter Parfums Inc is a global prestige fragrance firm that develops, manufactures and distributes perfumes, body care and related cosmetics. It partners with top luxury fashion and lifestyle brands to launch licensed fragrance lines, serving consumers across North America, Europe, Asia Pacific and other key markets via department stores, beauty retailers and official e-commerce channels.

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

IPAR vs KIM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.4× larger
KIM
$558.0M
$386.2M
IPAR
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
IPAR
IPAR
+2.8% gap
IPAR
6.8%
4.0%
KIM
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
22.5% more per $
KIM
29.8%
7.3%
IPAR
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
IPAR
IPAR
Annualised
IPAR
9.2%
5.6%
KIM

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
IPAR
IPAR
KIM
KIM
Revenue
$386.2M
$558.0M
Net Profit
$28.1M
$166.3M
Gross Margin
61.5%
Operating Margin
7.1%
37.2%
Net Margin
7.3%
29.8%
Revenue YoY
6.8%
4.0%
Net Profit YoY
16.0%
23.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.88
$0.46

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
IPAR
IPAR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$386.2M
$542.5M
Q3 25
$429.6M
$535.9M
Q2 25
$333.9M
$525.2M
Q1 25
$338.8M
$536.6M
Q4 24
$361.5M
$525.4M
Q3 24
$424.6M
$507.6M
Q2 24
$342.2M
$500.2M
Net Profit
IPAR
IPAR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$28.1M
$151.2M
Q3 25
$65.8M
$137.8M
Q2 25
$32.0M
$163.0M
Q1 25
$42.5M
$132.8M
Q4 24
$24.2M
$166.0M
Q3 24
$62.3M
$136.0M
Q2 24
$36.8M
$119.7M
Gross Margin
IPAR
IPAR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
61.5%
Q3 25
63.5%
Q2 25
66.2%
Q1 25
63.7%
Q4 24
64.5%
Q3 24
63.9%
Q2 24
64.5%
Operating Margin
IPAR
IPAR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
7.1%
36.4%
Q3 25
25.3%
34.9%
Q2 25
17.7%
39.2%
Q1 25
22.2%
33.6%
Q4 24
10.0%
31.7%
Q3 24
25.0%
33.7%
Q2 24
18.9%
32.1%
Net Margin
IPAR
IPAR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
7.3%
27.9%
Q3 25
15.3%
25.7%
Q2 25
9.6%
31.0%
Q1 25
12.5%
24.8%
Q4 24
6.7%
31.6%
Q3 24
14.7%
26.8%
Q2 24
10.8%
23.9%
EPS (diluted)
IPAR
IPAR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
$0.88
Q3 25
$2.05
Q2 25
$0.99
Q1 25
$1.32
Q4 24
$0.78
Q3 24
$1.93
Q2 24
$1.14

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
IPAR
IPAR
KIM
KIM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$137.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$176.0M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$880.7M
$10.4B
Total Assets
$1.6B
$19.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.20×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
IPAR
IPAR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$137.1M
$211.6M
Q3 25
$77.5M
$159.3M
Q2 25
$53.9M
$226.6M
Q1 25
$75.3M
$131.3M
Q4 24
$109.3M
$688.6M
Q3 24
$78.8M
$789.0M
Q2 24
$37.7M
$126.4M
Total Debt
IPAR
IPAR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$176.0M
$7.7B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$157.3M
$8.0B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
IPAR
IPAR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$880.7M
$10.4B
Q3 25
$870.9M
$10.5B
Q2 25
$839.4M
$10.5B
Q1 25
$788.6M
$10.6B
Q4 24
$744.9M
$10.7B
Q3 24
$778.5M
$10.5B
Q2 24
$717.1M
$10.6B
Total Assets
IPAR
IPAR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$1.6B
$19.7B
Q3 25
$1.6B
$19.9B
Q2 25
$1.6B
$19.8B
Q1 25
$1.4B
$19.7B
Q4 24
$1.4B
$20.3B
Q3 24
$1.5B
$20.1B
Q2 24
$1.4B
$19.5B
Debt / Equity
IPAR
IPAR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.20×
0.74×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.21×
0.75×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
IPAR
IPAR
KIM
KIM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$146.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$145.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
37.5%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
5.21×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$190.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
IPAR
IPAR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$146.5M
$258.4M
Q3 25
$63.9M
$332.4M
Q2 25
$11.9M
$305.4M
Q1 25
$-7.4M
$223.8M
Q4 24
$138.0M
$239.5M
Q3 24
$76.1M
$295.9M
Q2 24
$25.5M
$294.1M
Free Cash Flow
IPAR
IPAR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$145.0M
Q3 25
$57.6M
Q2 25
$-3.3M
Q1 25
$-8.8M
$205.4M
Q4 24
$136.1M
Q3 24
$75.4M
Q2 24
$24.4M
FCF Margin
IPAR
IPAR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
37.5%
Q3 25
13.4%
Q2 25
-1.0%
Q1 25
-2.6%
38.3%
Q4 24
37.7%
Q3 24
17.8%
Q2 24
7.1%
Capex Intensity
IPAR
IPAR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.4%
0.0%
Q3 25
1.5%
0.0%
Q2 25
4.5%
0.0%
Q1 25
0.4%
3.4%
Q4 24
0.5%
Q3 24
0.2%
Q2 24
0.3%
Cash Conversion
IPAR
IPAR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
5.21×
1.71×
Q3 25
0.97×
2.41×
Q2 25
0.37×
1.87×
Q1 25
-0.17×
1.69×
Q4 24
5.69×
1.44×
Q3 24
1.22×
2.18×
Q2 24
0.69×
2.46×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

IPAR
IPAR

European Based Operations$232.7M60%
United States Based Operations$155.2M40%

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

Related Comparisons