vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IQVIA (IQV) and Johnson Controls (JCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Johnson Controls is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.1B vs $4.2B, roughly 1.5× IQVIA). Johnson Controls runs the higher net margin — 10.0% vs 6.6%, a 3.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IQVIA posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.4% vs 8.2%). Over the past eight quarters, IQVIA's revenue compounded faster (4.3% CAGR vs -7.8%).
IQVIA Holdings, Inc., headquartered in Durham, North Carolina, is an American company focused on health information technology and clinical research.
Johnson Controls International plc is an Irish multinational conglomerate headquartered in Cork, Ireland, that produces fire, HVAC, and security equipment for buildings. As of mid-2019, it employed 105,000 people in around 2,000 locations across six continents. In 2017 it was listed as 389th in the Fortune Global 500. It became ineligible for the Fortune 500 in subsequent years since it relocated its headquarters outside the U.S.
IQV vs JCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.2B | $6.1B |
| Net Profit | $275.0M | $616.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 36.8% |
| Operating Margin | 12.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 6.6% | 10.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.4% | 8.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.0% | 17.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.61 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 26 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | $2.9B |
| Q2 26 | — | $616.0M | ||
| Q1 26 | $275.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $514.0M | $524.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $331.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $266.0M | $701.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $249.0M | $478.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $437.0M | $419.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $285.0M | $633.0M |
| Q2 26 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 35.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 48.4% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.6% | 11.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.0% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.8% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.1% | 6.9% |
| Q2 26 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 26 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.8% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.1% | 26.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | 11.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 8.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 21.6% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $1.61 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.97 | $0.85 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.93 | $2.61 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.54 | $1.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.40 | $0.72 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.41 | $0.63 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.55 | $0.93 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9B | $698.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $15.8B | $9.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.3B | $13.5B |
| Total Assets | $29.7B | $38.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.49× | 0.70× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | $698.0M | ||
| Q1 26 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $552.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $379.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $731.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $795.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $606.0M |
| Q2 26 | — | $9.5B | ||
| Q1 26 | $15.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.0B |
| Q2 26 | — | $13.5B | ||
| Q1 26 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $13.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $12.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $15.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $15.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1B | $15.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | $16.1B |
| Q2 26 | — | $38.4B | ||
| Q1 26 | $29.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.9B | $38.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.7B | $37.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6B | $43.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.3B | $42.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.9B | $42.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.2B | $42.7B |
| Q2 26 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 26 | 2.49× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.50× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $618.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $491.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.25× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.1B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $618.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $735.0M | $611.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $908.0M | $968.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $443.0M | $787.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $568.0M | $550.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $885.0M | $249.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $721.0M | $1.4B |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $491.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $561.0M | $531.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $772.0M | $838.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $292.0M | $693.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $426.0M | $456.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $721.0M | $133.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $571.0M | $1.2B |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 11.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.9% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.8% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.3% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.1% | 8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | 40.4% |
| Q2 26 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 5.8% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 2.25× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.43× | 1.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.74× | 0.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.67× | 1.12× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.28× | 1.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.03× | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.53× | 2.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
