vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IQVIA (IQV) and Vistra Corp. (VST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Vistra Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.8B vs $4.4B, roughly 1.1× IQVIA). IQVIA runs the higher net margin — 11.8% vs 4.8%, a 6.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vistra Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs 10.3%). Vistra Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($596.0M vs $561.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Vistra Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (23.3% CAGR vs 8.1%).
IQVIA Holdings, Inc., headquartered in Durham, North Carolina, is an American company focused on health information technology and clinical research.
Vistra may refer to either of two companies:Vistra, a corporate services company based in Hong Kong Vistra Corp, an energy company based in Texas
IQV vs VST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.4B | $4.8B |
| Net Profit | $514.0M | $233.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 14.4% | 9.9% |
| Net Margin | 11.8% | 4.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.3% | 31.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 17.6% | -47.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.97 | $0.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7B | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | $514.0M | $233.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $331.0M | $652.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $266.0M | $327.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $249.0M | $-268.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $437.0M | $441.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $285.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $363.0M | $365.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $288.0M | $-35.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.4% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.5% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.6% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.0% | -2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.8% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.1% | 59.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.6% | 22.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.5% | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | 11.8% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.1% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | -6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.0% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 43.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.7% | -1.1% |
| Q4 25 | $2.97 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.93 | $1.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.54 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.40 | $-0.93 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.41 | $1.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.55 | $5.25 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.97 | $0.90 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.56 | $-0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.1B | $785.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $15.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.5B | $5.1B |
| Total Assets | $29.9B | $41.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.11× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $785.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $602.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $458.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $561.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $905.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $14.7B |
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1B | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.3B | $5.7B |
| Q4 25 | $29.9B | $41.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.7B | $38.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6B | $38.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.3B | $38.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.9B | $37.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.2B | $37.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.4B | $39.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.6B | $38.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.49× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.60× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $735.0M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $561.0M | $596.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 12.9% | 12.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 17.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.43× | 6.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.1B | $1.3B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $735.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $908.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $443.0M | $572.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $568.0M | $599.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $885.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $721.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $588.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $522.0M | $312.0M |
| Q4 25 | $561.0M | $596.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $772.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $292.0M | $-118.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $426.0M | $-169.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $721.0M | $923.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $571.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $445.0M | $698.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $377.0M | $-153.0M |
| Q4 25 | 12.9% | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.8% | 21.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.3% | -3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.1% | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.2% | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.1% | -4.8% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 17.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | 18.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.9% | 14.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.43× | 6.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.74× | 2.25× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.67× | 1.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.28× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.03× | 3.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.53× | 0.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | 3.28× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.81× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IQV
Segment breakdown not available.
VST
| Retail Energy Charge In ERCOT | $2.1B | 43% |
| Retail Energy Charge In Northeast Midwest | $1.2B | 24% |
| East Segment | $1.1B | 24% |
| Hedging Revenue Realized | $170.0M | 4% |
| Revenue From Other Wholesale Contracts | $116.0M | 2% |
| Transferable Production Tax Credit Revenues | $78.0M | 2% |
| West Segment | $77.0M | 2% |
| Intersegment Sales | $25.0M | 1% |
