vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Iridium Communications Inc. (IRDM) and Verisign (VRSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Verisign is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($425.3M vs $219.1M, roughly 1.9× Iridium Communications Inc.). Verisign runs the higher net margin — 48.5% vs 9.9%, a 38.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Verisign posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs 1.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Verisign's revenue compounded faster (5.2% CAGR vs 4.4%).
Iridium Communications Inc. is a publicly traded American company headquartered in McLean, Virginia, United States. Iridium operates the Iridium satellite constellation, a system of 80 satellites: 66 are active satellites and the remaining fourteen function as in-orbit spares. Iridium Satellites are used for worldwide voice and data communication from handheld satellite phones, satellite messenger communication devices and integrated transceivers, as well as for two-way satellite messaging se...
Verisign, Inc. is an American company based in Reston, Virginia, that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the authoritative registry for the .com, .net, and .name generic top-level domains and the .cc country-code top-level domains, and the back-end systems for the .jobs and .edu sponsored top-level domains.
IRDM vs VRSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $219.1M | $425.3M |
| Net Profit | $21.6M | $206.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | 23.2% | 67.0% |
| Net Margin | 9.9% | 48.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.9% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $219.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $212.9M | $425.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $226.9M | $419.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.9M | $409.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.9M | $402.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $213.0M | $395.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $212.8M | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $201.1M | $387.1M |
| Q1 26 | $21.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $24.9M | $206.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.1M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.0M | $207.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.4M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.3M | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.4M | $201.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.3M | $198.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 88.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 88.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 88.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 87.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 87.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 88.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 87.8% |
| Q1 26 | 23.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.9% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.9% | 67.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.2% | 68.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.1% | 67.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.5% | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.7% | 68.8% |
| Q1 26 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | 48.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.4% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.1% | 48.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.5% | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | 51.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.35 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.27 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.30 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.27 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $580.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | — | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $96.5M | $580.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.5M | $617.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.3M | $593.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.9M | $648.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.5M | $599.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $159.6M | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.5M | $689.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $462.6M | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $450.5M | $-2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $473.6M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $518.4M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $576.6M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $663.8M | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $786.7M | $-1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.80× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $289.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $285.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 67.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.7% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $108.6M | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.8M | $307.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $129.6M | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.1M | $291.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $104.8M | $231.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $118.6M | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.1M | $160.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $75.1M | $285.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.2M | $303.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $194.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.5M | $285.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.5M | $222.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $100.0M | $247.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $68.7M | $151.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.3% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.9% | 72.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.2% | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.8% | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.0% | 63.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.2% | 39.1% |
| Q1 26 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | 2.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.37× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.71× | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.90× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.01× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.88× | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.85× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.51× | 0.81× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IRDM
| Voice and data | $57.4M | 26% |
| IoT data (2) | $46.0M | 21% |
| Government | $39.5M | 18% |
| Government service revenue (5) | $27.6M | 13% |
| Subscriber equipment | $20.2M | 9% |
| Hosted payload and other data service (4) | $14.8M | 7% |
| Broadband (3) | $12.2M | 6% |
| Commercial | $1.3M | 1% |
VRSN
Segment breakdown not available.
