vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Iron Mountain (IRM) and Mohawk Industries (MHK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Mohawk Industries is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.7B vs $1.8B, roughly 1.5× Iron Mountain). Iron Mountain runs the higher net margin — 5.1% vs 4.3%, a 0.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Iron Mountain posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.6% vs 8.0%). Mohawk Industries produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.8M vs $-16.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Iron Mountain's revenue compounded faster (11.7% CAGR vs -1.3%).
Iron Mountain Inc. is an American enterprise information management services company founded in 1951 and headquartered in Portsmouth, New Hampshire. Its records management, information destruction, and data backup and recovery services are supplied to more than 220,000 customers in 58 countries throughout North America, Europe, Latin America, Africa, Asia, and Oceania.
Mohawk Industries is an American flooring manufacturer based in Calhoun, Georgia. Mohawk produces floor covering products for residential and commercial applications in North America and residential applications in Europe. The company manufacturing portfolio consists of soft flooring products, hard flooring products, laminate flooring, sheet vinyl and luxury vinyl tile, natural stone and quartz countertops. In Europe, the company also produces and sells insulation, panels and mezzanine flooring.
IRM vs MHK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $2.7B |
| Net Profit | $93.1M | $117.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 23.5% |
| Operating Margin | 18.5% | 4.1% |
| Net Margin | 5.1% | 4.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 16.6% | 8.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -11.9% | 61.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $1.90 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $117.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $93.1M | $42.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.2M | $108.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-43.3M | $146.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.2M | $72.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.7M | $93.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-33.7M | $162.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.6M | $157.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 23.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.6% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.2% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.9% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.0% | 7.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.5% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.7% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.2% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.90 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.31 | $0.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.28 | $1.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.15 | $2.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.05 | $1.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.35 | $1.49 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.11 | $2.55 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $2.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $158.5M | $872.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $16.2B | $1.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-981.0M | $8.4B |
| Total Assets | $21.1B | $13.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.21× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $872.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $158.5M | $856.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $516.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $546.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $702.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $155.7M | $666.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $424.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $497.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.0B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $-981.0M | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-882.0M | $8.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-767.4M | $8.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-698.5M | $7.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-503.1M | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-259.0M | $7.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-132.9M | $7.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $13.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.1B | $13.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.6B | $13.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.2B | $13.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.4B | $13.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.7B | $12.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.5B | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0B | $13.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $500.0M | $110.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-16.2M | $7.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.9% | 0.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 28.0% | 3.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.37× | 0.94× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-931.6M | $709.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $110.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $500.0M | $459.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $267.6M | $386.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $375.1M | $206.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.3M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $431.6M | $397.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $252.9M | $319.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $382.2M | $233.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-16.2M | $265.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-256.3M | $310.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-181.6M | $126.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-477.5M | $-85.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-186.0M | $236.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-143.2M | $204.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.6M | $142.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.9% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.6% | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.6% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.0% | -3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.8% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -9.2% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | 5.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.9% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.5% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.4% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.1% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.4% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.9% | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.94× | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.37× | 10.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.10× | 3.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.15× | 0.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.08× | 4.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.04× | 1.48× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IRM
| Storage Rental | $1.1B | 58% |
| Services | $781.9M | 42% |
MHK
| Global Ceramic | $1.1B | 40% |
| Flooring NA | $880.0M | 32% |
| Flooring ROW | $751.3M | 28% |
