vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. (ITP) and KAMADA LTD (KMDA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KAMADA LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($47.0M vs $25.6M, roughly 1.8× IT TECH PACKAGING, INC.). KAMADA LTD runs the higher net margin — 11.3% vs -5.7%, a 16.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KAMADA LTD posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.6% vs 2.1%). Over the past eight quarters, KAMADA LTD's revenue compounded faster (12.0% CAGR vs 10.5%).
IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. is a paper manufacturing enterprise primarily operating in China. It produces and distributes a diverse portfolio of paper products including corrugated packaging paper, boxboard, and printing-use cultural paper, serving sectors such as consumer goods packaging, logistics, and commercial printing across its core market.
Kamada Ltd. is a global biopharmaceutical company specializing in the research, manufacturing, and commercialization of specialty pharmaceuticals derived from human plasma.
ITP vs KMDA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.6M | $47.0M |
| Net Profit | $-1.4M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | 7.9% | 42.0% |
| Operating Margin | -3.9% | 16.6% |
| Net Margin | -5.7% | 11.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.1% | 12.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 26.6% | 37.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $25.6M | $47.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.8M | $44.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.9M | $44.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.1M | $41.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.2M | $42.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9M | $37.7M | ||
| Q4 23 | $21.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | $-1.4M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.0M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | $4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-77.7K | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.7M | $2.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | $-4.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | 7.9% | 42.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.1% | 42.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 47.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.6% | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | 44.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | 44.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | 1.2% | — |
| Q3 25 | -3.9% | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.1% | 15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -31.0% | 17.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.8% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -51.0% | 10.7% | ||
| Q4 23 | -18.1% | — |
| Q3 25 | -5.7% | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.9% | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -32.2% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.9% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.3% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -54.6% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 23 | -19.0% | — |
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.35 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.40 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.20 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.37 | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 23 | $-0.40 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $72.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $152.0M | $265.2M |
| Total Assets | $175.7M | $377.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.03× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $66.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $76.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $56.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $48.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.4M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $11.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | $152.0M | $265.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.3M | $260.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $152.8M | $252.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $156.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.3M | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $163.5M | $251.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $164.3M | $251.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | $168.3M | — |
| Q3 25 | $175.7M | $377.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $175.2M | $368.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $175.2M | $375.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $177.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $190.0M | $351.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $191.4M | $351.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $177.5M | $343.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | $194.7M | — |
| Q3 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 0.07× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.5M | $10.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.97× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $3.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $-513.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5M | $22.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $721.9K | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $624.4K | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | $5.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $668.3K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $615.4K | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-7.7M | — |
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -36.7% | — |
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 62.4% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.75× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
