vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of ITT INC. (ITT) and Match Group (MTCH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

ITT INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $864.0M, roughly 1.4× Match Group). Match Group runs the higher net margin — 19.3% vs 6.6%, a 12.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ITT INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.7% vs 4.0%). Match Group produced more free cash flow last quarter ($174.0M vs $13.8M). Over the past eight quarters, ITT INC.'s revenue compounded faster (15.7% CAGR vs -0.0%).

ITT Inc., formerly ITT Corporation, is an American manufacturing company based in Stamford, Connecticut. The company produces specialty components for the aerospace, transportation, energy, and industrial markets. ITT's three business units are Industrial Process, Motion Technologies, and Connect and Control Technologies.

Match Group, Inc. is an American internet and technology company headquartered in Dallas, Texas. It owns and operates the largest global portfolio of popular online dating services including Tinder, Match.com, Meetic, OkCupid, Hinge, Plenty of Fish, Azar, and other dating global brands. The company was owned by IAC until July 2020 when Match Group was spun off as a separate, public company. As of 2019, the company had 9.3 million subscribers, of which 4.6 million were in North America. Japan ...

ITT vs MTCH — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ITT
ITT
1.4× larger
ITT
$1.2B
$864.0M
MTCH
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
ITT
ITT
+28.8% gap
ITT
32.7%
4.0%
MTCH
Higher net margin
MTCH
MTCH
12.8% more per $
MTCH
19.3%
6.6%
ITT
More free cash flow
MTCH
MTCH
$160.2M more FCF
MTCH
$174.0M
$13.8M
ITT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
ITT
ITT
Annualised
ITT
15.7%
-0.0%
MTCH

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
ITT
ITT
MTCH
MTCH
Revenue
$1.2B
$864.0M
Net Profit
$79.5M
$167.0M
Gross Margin
35.4%
75.6%
Operating Margin
11.7%
27.4%
Net Margin
6.6%
19.3%
Revenue YoY
32.7%
4.0%
Net Profit YoY
-28.0%
41.5%
EPS (diluted)
$0.89

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ITT
ITT
MTCH
MTCH
Q1 26
$1.2B
$864.0M
Q4 25
$1.1B
$878.0M
Q3 25
$999.1M
$914.3M
Q2 25
$972.4M
$863.7M
Q1 25
$913.0M
$831.2M
Q4 24
$929.0M
$860.2M
Q3 24
$885.2M
$895.5M
Q2 24
$905.9M
$864.1M
Net Profit
ITT
ITT
MTCH
MTCH
Q1 26
$79.5M
$167.0M
Q4 25
$131.7M
$209.7M
Q3 25
$126.9M
$160.8M
Q2 25
$121.0M
$125.5M
Q1 25
$108.4M
$117.6M
Q4 24
$127.0M
$158.3M
Q3 24
$161.1M
$136.5M
Q2 24
$119.2M
$133.3M
Gross Margin
ITT
ITT
MTCH
MTCH
Q1 26
35.4%
75.6%
Q4 25
35.5%
74.7%
Q3 25
35.6%
73.0%
Q2 25
35.7%
72.0%
Q1 25
34.6%
71.5%
Q4 24
34.1%
72.5%
Q3 24
35.5%
71.7%
Q2 24
34.9%
71.6%
Operating Margin
ITT
ITT
MTCH
MTCH
Q1 26
11.7%
27.4%
Q4 25
17.0%
32.4%
Q3 25
18.0%
24.2%
Q2 25
18.0%
22.5%
Q1 25
16.5%
20.8%
Q4 24
17.2%
26.0%
Q3 24
23.5%
23.5%
Q2 24
17.6%
23.7%
Net Margin
ITT
ITT
MTCH
MTCH
Q1 26
6.6%
19.3%
Q4 25
12.5%
23.9%
Q3 25
12.7%
17.6%
Q2 25
12.4%
14.5%
Q1 25
11.9%
14.1%
Q4 24
13.7%
18.4%
Q3 24
18.2%
15.2%
Q2 24
13.2%
15.4%
EPS (diluted)
ITT
ITT
MTCH
MTCH
Q1 26
$0.89
Q4 25
$1.64
$0.83
Q3 25
$1.62
$0.62
Q2 25
$1.52
$0.49
Q1 25
$1.33
$0.44
Q4 24
$1.54
$0.59
Q3 24
$1.96
$0.51
Q2 24
$1.45
$0.48

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ITT
ITT
MTCH
MTCH
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$600.8M
$1.0B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$477.3M
$3.6B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$4.7B
$-218.1M
Total Assets
$11.1B
$4.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.10×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ITT
ITT
MTCH
MTCH
Q1 26
$600.8M
$1.0B
Q4 25
$1.7B
$1.0B
Q3 25
$516.4M
$1.1B
Q2 25
$467.9M
$340.4M
Q1 25
$439.8M
$414.2M
Q4 24
$439.3M
$970.7M
Q3 24
$460.9M
$860.9M
Q2 24
$425.5M
$843.6M
Total Debt
ITT
ITT
MTCH
MTCH
Q1 26
$477.3M
$3.6B
Q4 25
$521.5M
$3.5B
Q3 25
$577.7M
Q2 25
$622.5M
Q1 25
$4.5M
$3.4B
Q4 24
$232.6M
$3.8B
Q3 24
$467.8M
$3.8B
Q2 24
$190.0M
$3.8B
Stockholders' Equity
ITT
ITT
MTCH
MTCH
Q1 26
$4.7B
$-218.1M
Q4 25
$4.1B
$-253.5M
Q3 25
$2.7B
$-223.9M
Q2 25
$2.6B
$-230.9M
Q1 25
$2.8B
$-182.7M
Q4 24
$2.8B
$-63.7M
Q3 24
$2.7B
$-88.5M
Q2 24
$2.6B
$-130.2M
Total Assets
ITT
ITT
MTCH
MTCH
Q1 26
$11.1B
$4.4B
Q4 25
$6.3B
$4.5B
Q3 25
$5.1B
$4.5B
Q2 25
$5.0B
$3.9B
Q1 25
$4.8B
$3.9B
Q4 24
$4.7B
$4.5B
Q3 24
$4.9B
$4.4B
Q2 24
$4.4B
$4.4B
Debt / Equity
ITT
ITT
MTCH
MTCH
Q1 26
0.10×
Q4 25
0.13×
Q3 25
0.22×
Q2 25
0.24×
Q1 25
0.00×
Q4 24
0.08×
Q3 24
0.17×
Q2 24
0.07×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ITT
ITT
MTCH
MTCH
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$194.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$13.8M
$174.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
1.1%
20.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.2%
2.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.16×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$484.7M
$1.0B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ITT
ITT
MTCH
MTCH
Q1 26
$194.4M
Q4 25
$227.8M
$322.8M
Q3 25
$173.9M
$320.6M
Q2 25
$153.7M
$243.8M
Q1 25
$113.4M
$193.1M
Q4 24
$223.2M
$254.7M
Q3 24
$123.9M
$264.9M
Q2 24
$157.7M
$129.0M
Free Cash Flow
ITT
ITT
MTCH
MTCH
Q1 26
$13.8M
$174.0M
Q4 25
$187.4M
$308.1M
Q3 25
$146.2M
$306.8M
Q2 25
$137.3M
$231.0M
Q1 25
$76.6M
$177.7M
Q4 24
$186.8M
$247.1M
Q3 24
$87.3M
$251.8M
Q2 24
$134.5M
$116.3M
FCF Margin
ITT
ITT
MTCH
MTCH
Q1 26
1.1%
20.1%
Q4 25
17.8%
35.1%
Q3 25
14.6%
33.6%
Q2 25
14.1%
26.7%
Q1 25
8.4%
21.4%
Q4 24
20.1%
28.7%
Q3 24
9.9%
28.1%
Q2 24
14.8%
13.5%
Capex Intensity
ITT
ITT
MTCH
MTCH
Q1 26
2.2%
2.4%
Q4 25
3.8%
1.7%
Q3 25
2.8%
1.5%
Q2 25
1.7%
1.5%
Q1 25
4.0%
1.9%
Q4 24
3.9%
0.9%
Q3 24
4.1%
1.5%
Q2 24
2.6%
1.5%
Cash Conversion
ITT
ITT
MTCH
MTCH
Q1 26
1.16×
Q4 25
1.73×
1.54×
Q3 25
1.37×
1.99×
Q2 25
1.27×
1.94×
Q1 25
1.05×
1.64×
Q4 24
1.76×
1.61×
Q3 24
0.77×
1.94×
Q2 24
1.32×
0.97×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons