vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INSPIRE VETERINARY PARTNERS, INC. (IVP) and Li Bang International Corp Inc. (LBGJ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Li Bang International Corp Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.7M vs $4.3M, roughly 1.1× INSPIRE VETERINARY PARTNERS, INC.). Li Bang International Corp Inc. runs the higher net margin — -23.9% vs -58.5%, a 34.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Inspire Veterinary Partners, Inc. is a U.S.-based operator of companion animal veterinary clinics. It delivers full-spectrum pet healthcare services including preventive care, diagnostic testing, surgery, dental care, and emergency treatment for dogs, cats and other small pets, serving communities across multiple U.S. states.
Li & Fung Limited is a Hong Kong–based supply chain management company. Established in 1906, the company became publicly traded in 1973 and has since played a significant role in manufacturing apparel, toys, and various consumer goods for major North American and European retailers. Significant growth occurred after its public listing, reaching a peak market capitalization in 2011, but the rise of platforms like Alibaba and Amazon, which directly connect manufacturers with consumers, created ...
IVP vs LBGJ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.3M | $4.7M |
| Net Profit | $-2.5M | $-1.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 17.8% |
| Operating Margin | -45.6% | -25.1% |
| Net Margin | -58.5% | -23.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 27.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $4.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $4.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $4.1M | — |
| Q3 25 | $-2.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.0M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.4M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-7.9M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -45.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -61.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -55.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -46.2% | -25.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -55.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -54.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -59.2% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -68.7% | — |
| Q3 25 | -58.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -70.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -66.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -119.4% | -23.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -86.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -77.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -70.8% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -191.4% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.8M | $10.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.2M | $7.8M |
| Total Assets | $24.0M | $28.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.82× | 1.31× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $523.7K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $681.2K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.1K | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $2.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | $11.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.0M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $446.3K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6M | $7.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $269.9K | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $2.7M | — |
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.2M | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.4M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $21.3M | — |
| Q3 25 | 2.82× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.96× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.84× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.67× | 1.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.10× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.3M | $258.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -30.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-4.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-898.3K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-677.5K | $258.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $149.7K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.2M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-910.9K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-709.4K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.3M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -30.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -38.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -156.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -68.8% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IVP
| Services | $3.1M | 73% |
| Products | $1.2M | 27% |
LBGJ
Segment breakdown not available.
