vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (IZEA) and Thryv Holdings, Inc. (THRY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Thryv Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($191.6M vs $6.1M, roughly 31.6× IZEA Worldwide, Inc.). Thryv Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -5.0% vs -19.3%, a 14.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Thryv Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.7% vs -44.9%). Over the past eight quarters, IZEA Worldwide, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-6.6% CAGR vs -9.4%).
IZEA Worldwide, Inc. is a global marketing technology firm that operates platforms linking brands, advertising agencies, and content creators including social media influencers, bloggers, and video creators. It offers end-to-end solutions for influencer marketing campaigns, content creation, performance tracking, and audience engagement, serving clients across consumer goods, retail, technology, and entertainment sectors primarily in North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific markets.
Thryv Holdings, Inc. is a publicly traded software as a service (SaaS) company, providing customer relationship management and online reputation management software for small businesses. It has headquarters in Dallas, Texas, and operates in 48 states across the United States of America with more than 2,400 employees. The company began as a conglomerate of Yellow Pages companies. In June 2020, Thryv reported $1.3 billion in revenue over a twelve-month period.
IZEA vs THRY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.1M | $191.6M |
| Net Profit | $-1.2M | $-9.7M |
| Gross Margin | 45.8% | 68.0% |
| Operating Margin | -26.6% | 5.3% |
| Net Margin | -19.3% | -5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -44.9% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 74.7% | -222.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $-0.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.1M | $191.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.1M | $201.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1M | $210.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $181.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.0M | $186.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8M | $179.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.1M | $224.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0M | $233.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $-9.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $147.7K | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $13.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-142.8K | $-9.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.6M | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.8M | $-96.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.2M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.3M | $8.4M |
| Q4 25 | 45.8% | 68.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.6% | 67.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 52.0% | 69.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.8% | 65.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.8% | 65.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.0% | 62.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.1% | 66.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.9% | 65.8% |
| Q4 25 | -26.6% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.1% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | -1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.9% | -3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -105.9% | -49.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -31.8% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -58.4% | 13.3% |
| Q4 25 | -19.3% | -5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.2% | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.8% | -5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -42.0% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -99.3% | -53.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -47.0% | 3.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.07 | $0.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $0.28 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.52 | $-2.65 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.13 | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.20 | $0.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $50.9M | $10.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $9.1K | $253.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $48.9M | $218.1M |
| Total Assets | $57.5M | $688.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | 1.16× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $50.9M | $10.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.4M | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.6M | $10.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.2M | $11.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.1M | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.4M | $12.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.6M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.1M | $14.4M |
| Q4 25 | $9.1K | $253.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.9K | $268.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.7K | $275.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.6K | $299.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $63.4K | $284.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.3K | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.1K | $342.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $108.0K | $347.6M |
| Q4 25 | $48.9M | $218.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.9M | $221.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.4M | $214.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.3M | $193.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.8M | $196.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.3M | $94.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.8M | $183.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $62.5M | $167.1M |
| Q4 25 | $57.5M | $688.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.9M | $701.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.6M | $687.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $59.3M | $703.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.2M | $712.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.1M | $654.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.7M | $785.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $76.0M | $786.8M |
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | 1.16× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | 1.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 1.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | 1.55× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | 3.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.00× | 2.08× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-5.2K | $22.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $12.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $31.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-5.2K | $22.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $22.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-762.1K | $29.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $-10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.8M | $26.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | $36.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.9M | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.3M | $5.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-787.8K | $21.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $-17.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.8M | $17.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | $27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.9M | $13.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.4M | $-1.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.6% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.2% | -9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -25.6% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.2% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -43.2% | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -48.3% | -0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 3.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.05× | 3.93× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.63× | 2.12× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.65× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IZEA
Segment breakdown not available.
THRY
| Software As A Service | $119.0M | 62% |
| $56.2M | 29% | |
| Digital | $16.4M | 9% |
