vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Jacobs Solutions (J) and Unum Group (UNM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Unum Group is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.4B vs $3.3B, roughly 1.0× Jacobs Solutions). Unum Group runs the higher net margin — 6.9% vs 3.8%, a 3.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Jacobs Solutions posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.3% vs 8.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Unum Group's revenue compounded faster (1.9% CAGR vs -12.2%).

Jacobs Solutions Inc. is an American international technical professional services firm based in Dallas. The company provides engineering, technical, professional, and construction services as well as scientific and specialty consulting for a broad range of clients globally, including companies, organizations, and government agencies. Jacobs has consistently ranked No.

Unum Group is an American insurance company headquartered in Chattanooga, Tennessee. Founded as Union Mutual in 1848 and known as UnumProvident from 1999–2007, the company is part of the Fortune 500. Unum Group was created by the 1999 merger of Unum Corporation and The Provident Companies and comprises four distinct businesses – Unum US, Unum UK, Unum Poland and Colonial Life. Its underwriting insurers include The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company and Provident Life and Accident Insurance Co...

J vs UNM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
UNM
UNM
1.0× larger
UNM
$3.4B
$3.3B
J
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
J
J
+3.8% gap
J
12.3%
8.5%
UNM
Higher net margin
UNM
UNM
3.1% more per $
UNM
6.9%
3.8%
J
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
UNM
UNM
Annualised
UNM
1.9%
-12.2%
J

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
J
J
UNM
UNM
Revenue
$3.3B
$3.4B
Net Profit
$125.5M
$232.0M
Gross Margin
23.2%
Operating Margin
7.1%
Net Margin
3.8%
6.9%
Revenue YoY
12.3%
8.5%
Net Profit YoY
792.3%
22.7%
EPS (diluted)
$1.12

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
J
J
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
$3.4B
Q4 25
$3.3B
$3.2B
Q3 25
$3.2B
$3.4B
Q2 25
$3.0B
$3.4B
Q1 25
$2.9B
$3.1B
Q4 24
$2.9B
$3.2B
Q3 24
$-1.2B
$3.2B
Q2 24
$4.2B
$3.2B
Net Profit
J
J
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
$232.0M
Q4 25
$125.5M
$174.1M
Q3 25
$122.2M
$39.7M
Q2 25
$179.6M
$335.6M
Q1 25
$5.6M
$189.1M
Q4 24
$-18.1M
$348.7M
Q3 24
$325.4M
$645.7M
Q2 24
$146.9M
$389.5M
Gross Margin
J
J
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
Q4 25
23.2%
Q3 25
24.3%
Q2 25
25.0%
Q1 25
25.4%
Q4 24
24.6%
Q3 24
Q2 24
21.7%
Operating Margin
J
J
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
Q4 25
7.1%
6.7%
Q3 25
6.7%
1.6%
Q2 25
7.8%
12.4%
Q1 25
7.2%
7.9%
Q4 24
7.1%
13.8%
Q3 24
15.6%
Q2 24
6.2%
15.3%
Net Margin
J
J
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
6.9%
Q4 25
3.8%
5.4%
Q3 25
3.9%
1.2%
Q2 25
5.9%
10.0%
Q1 25
0.2%
6.1%
Q4 24
-0.6%
10.8%
Q3 24
-28.1%
20.1%
Q2 24
3.5%
12.0%
EPS (diluted)
J
J
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.12
$1.06
Q3 25
$0.88
$0.23
Q2 25
$1.55
$1.92
Q1 25
$0.06
$1.06
Q4 24
$-0.11
$1.91
Q3 24
$2.50
$3.46
Q2 24
$1.17
$2.05

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
J
J
UNM
UNM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.6B
$2.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$3.8M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$3.4B
$10.9M
Total Assets
$11.6B
$62.7M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.35×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
J
J
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
$2.1M
Q4 25
$1.6B
Q3 25
$1.2B
Q2 25
$1.3B
Q1 25
$1.2B
Q4 24
$1.3B
Q3 24
$1.1B
Q2 24
$1.2B
Total Debt
J
J
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
$3.8M
Q4 25
$3.8B
Q3 25
$3.5B
Q2 25
$3.5B
Q1 25
$3.5B
Q4 24
$3.5B
Q3 24
$3.5B
Q2 24
$3.5B
Stockholders' Equity
J
J
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
$10.9M
Q4 25
$3.4B
$11.1B
Q3 25
$3.6B
$10.9B
Q2 25
$3.8B
$11.3B
Q1 25
$3.9B
$11.2B
Q4 24
$4.2B
$11.0B
Q3 24
$4.5B
$11.0B
Q2 24
$6.6B
$10.5B
Total Assets
J
J
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
$62.7M
Q4 25
$11.6B
$63.5B
Q3 25
$11.3B
$63.7B
Q2 25
$11.4B
$62.8B
Q1 25
$11.2B
$62.5B
Q4 24
$11.6B
$62.0B
Q3 24
$11.8B
$64.1B
Q2 24
$15.0B
$62.0B
Debt / Equity
J
J
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
0.35×
Q4 25
0.34×
Q3 25
0.32×
Q2 25
0.31×
Q1 25
0.31×
Q4 24
0.32×
Q3 24
0.32×
Q2 24
0.33×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
J
J
UNM
UNM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$380.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$364.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
11.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
3.03×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$875.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
J
J
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$380.8M
$357.9M
Q3 25
$383.1M
$-371.8M
Q2 25
$292.6M
$348.0M
Q1 25
$-96.4M
$353.6M
Q4 24
$107.5M
$485.8M
Q3 24
$196.5M
$390.0M
Q2 24
$482.6M
$339.1M
Free Cash Flow
J
J
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$364.9M
$320.1M
Q3 25
$353.5M
$-402.6M
Q2 25
$270.5M
$320.1M
Q1 25
$-113.7M
$317.8M
Q4 24
$97.1M
$453.8M
Q3 24
$158.2M
$352.3M
Q2 24
$444.9M
$311.4M
FCF Margin
J
J
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
Q4 25
11.1%
9.9%
Q3 25
11.2%
-11.9%
Q2 25
8.9%
9.5%
Q1 25
-3.9%
10.3%
Q4 24
3.3%
14.0%
Q3 24
-13.6%
11.0%
Q2 24
10.5%
9.6%
Capex Intensity
J
J
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.5%
1.2%
Q3 25
0.9%
0.9%
Q2 25
0.7%
0.8%
Q1 25
0.6%
1.2%
Q4 24
0.4%
1.0%
Q3 24
-3.3%
1.2%
Q2 24
0.9%
0.9%
Cash Conversion
J
J
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
Q4 25
3.03×
2.06×
Q3 25
3.13×
-9.37×
Q2 25
1.63×
1.04×
Q1 25
-17.18×
1.87×
Q4 24
1.39×
Q3 24
0.60×
0.60×
Q2 24
3.28×
0.87×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

J
J

Infrastructure Advanced Facilities$2.9B89%
PA Consulting$354.4M11%

UNM
UNM

Premium Income$2.8B83%
Other$561.2M17%

Related Comparisons