vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of JACK IN THE BOX INC (JACK) and UNIVERSAL LOGISTICS HOLDINGS, INC. (ULH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

UNIVERSAL LOGISTICS HOLDINGS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($385.4M vs $349.5M, roughly 1.1× JACK IN THE BOX INC). UNIVERSAL LOGISTICS HOLDINGS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 1.0% vs -0.7%, a 1.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNIVERSAL LOGISTICS HOLDINGS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-17.1% vs -25.5%). UNIVERSAL LOGISTICS HOLDINGS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.3M vs $7.3M). Over the past eight quarters, UNIVERSAL LOGISTICS HOLDINGS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (-11.5% CAGR vs -18.6%).

Jack in the Box, Inc. is an American fast food restaurant chain founded on February 21, 1951, by Robert O. Peterson in San Diego, California, where it is headquartered. The chain has over 2,200 locations, primarily serving the West Coast of the United States. Restaurants are also found in large urban areas outside the West Coast, as well as two in Guam. The company also formerly operated the Qdoba Mexican Grill chain until Apollo Global Management bought the chain in December 2017.

Universal Music Group N.V. is a multinational music corporation under Dutch law. UMG's corporate headquarters are located in Hilversum, Netherlands, and its operational headquarters are located in Santa Monica, California. As the biggest music company in the world, it is one of the "Big Three" record labels, along with Sony Music Entertainment and Warner Music Group. Tencent acquired ten percent of Universal Music Group in March 2020 for €3 billion and acquired an additional ten percent stake...

JACK vs ULH — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ULH
ULH
1.1× larger
ULH
$385.4M
$349.5M
JACK
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
ULH
ULH
+8.4% gap
ULH
-17.1%
-25.5%
JACK
Higher net margin
ULH
ULH
1.7% more per $
ULH
1.0%
-0.7%
JACK
More free cash flow
ULH
ULH
$6.9M more FCF
ULH
$14.3M
$7.3M
JACK
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
ULH
ULH
Annualised
ULH
-11.5%
-18.6%
JACK

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
JACK
JACK
ULH
ULH
Revenue
$349.5M
$385.4M
Net Profit
$-2.5M
$3.7M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
13.3%
4.5%
Net Margin
-0.7%
1.0%
Revenue YoY
-25.5%
-17.1%
Net Profit YoY
-107.3%
-81.5%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.13
$0.14

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
JACK
JACK
ULH
ULH
Q1 26
$349.5M
Q4 25
$385.4M
Q3 25
$396.8M
Q2 25
$336.7M
$393.8M
Q1 25
$371.1M
$382.4M
Q4 24
$465.1M
Q3 24
$426.8M
Q2 24
$365.3M
$462.2M
Net Profit
JACK
JACK
ULH
ULH
Q1 26
$-2.5M
Q4 25
$3.7M
Q3 25
$-117.9M
Q2 25
$-142.2M
$8.3M
Q1 25
$33.7M
$6.0M
Q4 24
$20.2M
Q3 24
$26.5M
Q2 24
$25.0M
$30.7M
Operating Margin
JACK
JACK
ULH
ULH
Q1 26
13.3%
Q4 25
4.5%
Q3 25
-29.6%
Q2 25
-46.7%
5.1%
Q1 25
19.0%
4.1%
Q4 24
8.2%
Q3 24
10.0%
Q2 24
14.8%
10.2%
Net Margin
JACK
JACK
ULH
ULH
Q1 26
-0.7%
Q4 25
1.0%
Q3 25
-29.7%
Q2 25
-42.2%
2.1%
Q1 25
9.1%
1.6%
Q4 24
4.3%
Q3 24
6.2%
Q2 24
6.8%
6.7%
EPS (diluted)
JACK
JACK
ULH
ULH
Q1 26
$-0.13
Q4 25
$0.14
Q3 25
$-4.48
Q2 25
$-7.47
$0.32
Q1 25
$1.75
$0.23
Q4 24
$0.76
Q3 24
$1.01
Q2 24
$1.26
$1.17

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
JACK
JACK
ULH
ULH
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$26.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.6B
$797.6M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-936.0M
$540.4M
Total Assets
$2.0B
$1.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.48×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
JACK
JACK
ULH
ULH
Q1 26
Q4 25
$26.8M
Q3 25
$27.4M
Q2 25
$24.3M
Q1 25
$20.6M
Q4 24
$19.4M
Q3 24
$11.8M
Q2 24
$7.5M
Total Debt
JACK
JACK
ULH
ULH
Q1 26
$1.6B
Q4 25
$797.6M
Q3 25
$824.2M
Q2 25
$1.7B
$795.5M
Q1 25
$1.7B
$736.7M
Q4 24
$759.1M
Q3 24
$557.4M
Q2 24
$1.7B
$483.8M
Stockholders' Equity
JACK
JACK
ULH
ULH
Q1 26
$-936.0M
Q4 25
$540.4M
Q3 25
$534.9M
Q2 25
$-976.2M
$653.7M
Q1 25
$-827.1M
$646.4M
Q4 24
$647.0M
Q3 24
$631.0M
Q2 24
$-702.6M
$608.9M
Total Assets
JACK
JACK
ULH
ULH
Q1 26
$2.0B
Q4 25
$1.8B
Q3 25
$1.8B
Q2 25
$2.6B
$1.9B
Q1 25
$2.8B
$1.8B
Q4 24
$1.8B
Q3 24
$1.6B
Q2 24
$2.9B
$1.5B
Debt / Equity
JACK
JACK
ULH
ULH
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.48×
Q3 25
1.54×
Q2 25
1.22×
Q1 25
1.14×
Q4 24
1.17×
Q3 24
0.88×
Q2 24
0.79×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
JACK
JACK
ULH
ULH
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$30.5M
$47.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$7.3M
$14.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
2.1%
3.7%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
6.6%
8.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
12.62×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$34.8M
$-41.1M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
JACK
JACK
ULH
ULH
Q1 26
$30.5M
Q4 25
$47.1M
Q3 25
$25.9M
Q2 25
$-36.8M
$25.7M
Q1 25
$105.7M
$84.3M
Q4 24
$59.7M
Q3 24
$6.2M
Q2 24
$16.7M
$9.6M
Free Cash Flow
JACK
JACK
ULH
ULH
Q1 26
$7.3M
Q4 25
$14.3M
Q3 25
$-28.6M
Q2 25
$-63.2M
$-58.5M
Q1 25
$84.4M
$31.7M
Q4 24
$18.9M
Q3 24
$-58.9M
Q2 24
$6.4M
$-67.6M
FCF Margin
JACK
JACK
ULH
ULH
Q1 26
2.1%
Q4 25
3.7%
Q3 25
-7.2%
Q2 25
-18.8%
-14.9%
Q1 25
22.7%
8.3%
Q4 24
4.1%
Q3 24
-13.8%
Q2 24
1.8%
-14.6%
Capex Intensity
JACK
JACK
ULH
ULH
Q1 26
6.6%
Q4 25
8.5%
Q3 25
13.7%
Q2 25
7.9%
21.4%
Q1 25
5.7%
13.7%
Q4 24
8.8%
Q3 24
15.3%
Q2 24
2.8%
16.7%
Cash Conversion
JACK
JACK
ULH
ULH
Q1 26
Q4 25
12.62×
Q3 25
Q2 25
3.09×
Q1 25
3.14×
14.02×
Q4 24
2.96×
Q3 24
0.23×
Q2 24
0.67×
0.31×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

JACK
JACK

Restaurant Sales$131.9M38%
Franchise$97.4M28%
Royaltyand Other$58.9M17%
Advertising$56.6M16%
Technology Service$4.7M1%
Franchise Fees$1.7M0%

ULH
ULH

Value Added Services$183.7M48%
Dedicated Services$84.9M22%
Intermodal$52.7M14%
Truckload Services$48.8M13%
Brokerage Services$16.1M4%

Related Comparisons