vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JACK IN THE BOX INC (JACK) and Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JACK IN THE BOX INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($349.5M vs $346.5M, roughly 1.0× Select Water Solutions, Inc.). Select Water Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -0.1% vs -0.7%, a 0.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Select Water Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.7% vs -25.5%). JACK IN THE BOX INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.3M vs $-6.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Select Water Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-2.8% CAGR vs -18.6%).
Jack in the Box, Inc. is an American fast food restaurant chain founded on February 21, 1951, by Robert O. Peterson in San Diego, California, where it is headquartered. The chain has over 2,200 locations, primarily serving the West Coast of the United States. Restaurants are also found in large urban areas outside the West Coast, as well as two in Guam. The company also formerly operated the Qdoba Mexican Grill chain until Apollo Global Management bought the chain in December 2017.
Select Water Solutions, Inc. is a leading provider of end-to-end water management, fluid handling, and environmental sustainability services primarily catering to the North American onshore oil and gas exploration and production sector. Its core offerings include water sourcing, treatment, recycling, disposal, and chemical solutions to help clients cut operational costs and reduce environmental footprint.
JACK vs WTTR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $349.5M | $346.5M |
| Net Profit | $-2.5M | $-346.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 13.1% |
| Operating Margin | 13.3% | -0.1% |
| Net Margin | -0.7% | -0.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -25.5% | -0.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -107.3% | 78.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.13 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $349.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $346.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $322.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $336.7M | $364.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $371.1M | $374.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $349.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $371.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $365.3M | $365.1M |
| Q1 26 | $-2.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-346.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-142.2M | $10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.7M | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.0M | $12.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.5% |
| Q1 26 | 13.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -46.7% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.0% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.8% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | -0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -42.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 3.5% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.47 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.75 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.26 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $18.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.6B | $320.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-936.0M | $805.6M |
| Total Assets | $2.0B | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.40× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $18.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $51.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $27.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.4M |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $320.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $305.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $275.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $250.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $85.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $90.0M |
| Q1 26 | $-936.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $805.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $808.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-976.2M | $799.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-827.1M | $793.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $793.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $796.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-702.6M | $782.0M |
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.12× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $30.5M | $65.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $7.3M | $-6.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.1% | -1.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.6% | 20.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $34.8M | $-79.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $30.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $65.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $71.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-36.8M | $82.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.7M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $67.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $51.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $83.1M |
| Q1 26 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-23.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-63.2M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.4M | $-53.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4M | $34.0M |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.7% | -14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 9.3% |
| Q1 26 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 13.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 26.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.14× | -0.61× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.67× | 6.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JACK
| Restaurant Sales | $131.9M | 38% |
| Franchise | $97.4M | 28% |
| Royaltyand Other | $58.9M | 17% |
| Advertising | $56.6M | 16% |
| Technology Service | $4.7M | 1% |
| Franchise Fees | $1.7M | 0% |
WTTR
| Water Services | $178.3M | 51% |
| Marcellus Utica | $38.6M | 11% |
| Rockies | $38.3M | 11% |
| Eagle Ford | $28.2M | 8% |
| Midcon | $23.0M | 7% |
| Haynesville E.Texas | $19.1M | 6% |
| Bakken | $17.3M | 5% |
| Eliminations And Other Geographical Regions | $3.6M | 1% |
