vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Janus International Group, Inc. (JBI) and PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PicoCELA Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.6M vs $219.3M, roughly 1.2× Janus International Group, Inc.). Janus International Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.9% vs -125.2%, a 132.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. Janus International Group, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.3M vs $-256.6M).
Janus Henderson is a British-American global asset management group headquartered in the City of London, United Kingdom. It offers a range of financial products to individuals, intermediary advisors, and institutional investors globally under the trade name Janus Henderson Investors.
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
JBI vs PCLA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $219.3M | $252.6M |
| Net Profit | $15.2M | $-316.2M |
| Gross Margin | 39.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.4% | -114.8% |
| Net Margin | 6.9% | -125.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.7% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 28.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $219.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $210.5M | $252.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $230.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $230.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $248.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $254.5M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $263.8M | — |
| Q3 25 | $15.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.8M | $-316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $300.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.7M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $35.7M | — |
| Q3 25 | 39.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.4% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 43.4% | — |
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | -114.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.8% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 24.2% | — |
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | -125.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 13.5% | — |
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.15 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $0.24 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $456.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $560.8M | $354.8M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $456.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $110.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $171.7M | — |
| Q3 25 | $560.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $543.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $526.8M | $354.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $518.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $526.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $556.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $535.4M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $519.6M | — |
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $1.4B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.0M | $-245.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.3M | $-256.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.8% | -101.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.1% | 4.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.99× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $140.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.3M | $-245.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.6M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $68.5M | — |
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.9M | $-256.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $63.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | -101.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 23.9% | — |
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 2.1% | — |
| Q3 25 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.48× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.47× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 171.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.64× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.93× | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 1.92× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JBI
| Self Storage New Construction | $72.3M | 33% |
| Commercial And Others | $65.5M | 30% |
| Self Storage R3 | $54.0M | 25% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $15.5M | 7% |
| Transferred Over Time | $12.8M | 6% |
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |
